Acams CAMS-FCI Exam Practice Test Instant Access

Question 1

During onboarding al Private Bank A, client C indicated that the account would be initially funded with a transfer from Bank B totaling 50 million USD. On which source of funds should Bank A conduct additional scrutiny? (Select Two.)

AClient's verified employment income

BThird-party transfer

CClient's overall wealth

DTransfer from Bank B

EDocumented sale of client properties

Answer : B, D

The sources of funds that Bank A should conduct additional scrutiny on are the third-party transfer and the transfer from Bank B. This is because these sources may pose higher risks of money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud, or other illicit activities. Some of the reasons why these sources require more scrutiny are23:

Third-party transfers may involve unknown or unrelated parties that may have ulterior motives or hidden agendas. They may also be used to obscure the origin or destination of funds, or to circumvent sanctions or other regulatory restrictions.

Transfers from Bank B may involve jurisdictions that have weak anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) regimes, high levels of corruption, or significant criminal activity. They may also involve banks that have poor reputation, compliance, or transparency standards.

Third Party Payments - Wolfsberg Group

Guidance on Correspondent Banking Services - FATF

Question 2

A client at a financial institution deposits large amounts of money into an account, and almost immediately, the funds are then distributed to numerous individuals' accounts. The transaction activity described in the scenario is a pattern of:

Ageographic usage.

Bdeposit trading.

Csafe deposit custody.

Daccount usage.

Answer : B

Deposit trading is a pattern of suspicious activity where a client deposits large amounts of money into an account, and then transfers the funds to other accounts, often in different jurisdictions or countries. This could be an attempt to disguise the source or destination of the funds, or to avoid reporting requirements. Deposit trading is also known as layering, which is the second stage of money laundering.

Question 3

In which case should an investigator avoid escalating a suspicious event to the chief compliance officer and pursue other channels?

AThe transaction chain is likely connected to a known member of a terrorist organization.

BA close family member of the chief compliance officer is the beneficiary of a cross-border transfer.

CA trade entity engages in complex trade deals involving numerous third-party intermediaries in incongruent lines of business.

DAn individual involved in a large sum transaction is a foreign PEP.

Answer : B

An investigator should avoid escalating a suspicious event to the chief compliance officer if there is a potential conflict of interest, such as when a close family member of the officer is involved in the transaction. In such a case, the investigator should pursue other channels, such as reporting to a higher authority or an independent committee. The other options do not present a conflict of interest and should be escalated to the chief compliance officer as part of the normal procedure.

Question 4

An investigator at a corporate bank is conducting transaction monitoring alerts clearance.

KYC profile background: An entity customer, doing business offshore in Hong Kong, established a banking business relationship with the bank since 2017 for deposit and loan purposes. It acts as an offshore investment holding company. The customer declared that the ongoing source of funds to this account comes from group-related companies.

* X is the UBO. and owns 97% shares of this entity customer;

* Y is is the authorized signatory of this entity customer. This entity customer was previously the subject of a SAR/STR.

KYC PROFILE

Customer Name: AAA International Company. Ltd

Customer ID: 123456

Account Opened: June 2017

Last KYC review date: 15 Nov 2020

Country and Year of Incorporation: The British Virgin Islands, May 2017

AML risk level: High

Account opening and purpose: Deposits, Loans and Trade Finance

Anticipated account activities: 1 to 5 transactions per year and around 1 million per

transaction amount

During the investigation, the investigator reviewed remittance transactions activities for the period from Jul 2019 to Sep 2021 and noted the following transactions pattern:

TRANSACTION JOURNAL

Review dates: from July 2019 to Sept 2021

For Hong Kong Dollars (HKD) currency:

Incoming transactions: 2 inward remittances of around 1.88 million HKD in total from

different third parties

Outgoing transactions: 24 outward remittances of around 9 4 million HKD in total to

different third parties

For United States Dollars (USD) currency:

Incoming transactions: 13 inward remittances of around 3.3 million USD in total from

different third parties

Outgoing transactions: 10 outward remittances of around 9.4 million USD in total to

different third parties.

RFI Information and Supporting documents:

According to the RFI reply received on 26 May 2021, the customer provided the bank

with the information below:

1) All incoming funds received in HKD & USD currencies were monies lent from non-customers of the bank. Copies of loan agreements had been provided as supporting documents. All of the loan agreements were in the same format and all the lenders are engaged in trading business.

2) Some loan agreements were signed among four parties, including among lenders. borrower (the bank's customer), guarantor, and guardian with supplemental agreements, which stated that the customer, as a borrower, who failed to repay the loan

After reviewing the transaction journal, request for information response, and supporting documentation, the investigator determines that additional information is needed. Which additional information should the investigator request?

APreviously filed SARVSTR unrelated to the customer, but similar in content

BFormation document/description of the group-related companies

CSource of the incoming funds to the group-related companies

DAdverse news screening on all names listed in the formation documents

Answer : C

The additional information that the investigator should request is the source of the incoming funds to the group-related companies. This is because the customer declared that the ongoing source of funds to this account comes from group-related companies, but the transaction journal shows that the customer received funds from different third parties, not from group-related companies. Therefore, the investigator should verify the relationship and legitimacy of these third parties and their funds with the customer and the group-related companies. The other options are not relevant or necessary for this investigation.

Question 5

SAR/STR NARRATIVE

A SAR/STR has been submitted on five transactions conducted on the correspondent banking relationship with ABC Bank.

Client Information:

Remitter information: DEF Oil Resource Ltd. is the oldest member of the DEF Group. It was founded in 1977 as a general trading business with a primary focus on exports from Africa and North Americ

a. The group has business activities that span the entire energy value chain. Their core field of endeavor is centered within the oil and gas industry and its associated sub-sectors.

Beneficiary Information:

As per the response received from ABC Bank, it was determined that the beneficiaries are related to DEF Oil Resource Ltd. These were created by DEF Oil Resource Ltd. to purchase property in a foreign country on behalf of their senior management as part of a bonus scheme. The purpose behind this payment was for the purchase of property in another country.

Payment Reference:

ABCXXXXX31PZFG2H

ABCXXXXXX51PQGEH

ABCXXXXXX214QWVG

ABCXXXXXX41PSXA2

ABCXXXXXX815QWS3

Concerns:

* We are unsure about the country of incorporation of the beneficiaries.

* We are concerned about the transactional activity since the payment made towards entities (conducted on behalf of individuals) appears to be possible tax evasion.

* There appears to be an attempt to conceal the identity of individuals (senior management), which again raises concerns about the source of funds.

* Referring to the response received from ABC Bank, we are unclear about the ultimate beneficiary of funds.

* The remitter is involved in a high-risk business, (i.e., oil and crude products trading), and the beneficiary is involved in real estate business which again poses a higher risk.

While reviewing the account activity, it is noted that several transfers are sent to a company located in an offshore jurisdiction. Which step should the investigator take next?

ARequest information from the company.

BFile a SAR/STR to the FIU where the company is located.

CRequest information about the beneficiaries related to the company.

DConduct an open-source search to determine the ownership and registration of the company.

Answer : C

The best step for the investigator to take next is to request information about the beneficiaries related to the company. This will help to identify the ultimate beneficial owners of the funds and the purpose of the transactions. Requesting information from the company or filing a SAR/STR to the FIU where the company is located may not be feasible or effective, as the company may not cooperate or the FIU may not have jurisdiction over the offshore entity. Conducting an open-source search may provide some information about the ownership and registration of the company, but it may not be sufficient or reliable to determine the nature and legitimacy of the transactions.

SAR Narrative Guidance Package

Best Practices for Drafting an STR or SAR

Question 6

An analyst reviews an alert for high volume Automated Clearing House (ACH) activity in an account. The analyst's initial research finds the account is for a commercial daycare account that receives high volumes of large government-funded ACH transactions to support the programs. The account activity consists of checks (cheques) made payable to individual names in varying dollar amounts. One check indicates rent to another business.

An Internet search finds that the daycare company owner has previous government-issued violations for safety and classroom size needs, such as not having enough chairs and tables per enrollee. These violations were issued to a different daycare name.

Simultaneous to this investigation, another analyst sends an email about negative news articles referencing local child/adult daycare companies misusing governmental grants. This prompts the financial institution (Fl) to search all businesses for names containing daycare' or care*. Text searches return a number of facilities as customers at the Fl and detects that three of these businesses have a similar transaction flow of high volume government ACH funding with little to no daycare expenses.

The analyst determines that site visits should be conducted for the three daycare businesses. Which observations at the on-site visits would justify writing a SAR/STR? (Select Three.)

ASigns of severe wear and poor maintenance at the site

BA site located in a commercial building

CLights turned off at the site during operational hours

DVisible attendance with children being dropped off by parents

EVisible signage indicating the purpose of the building

FA full parking lot of cars with no staff at the site

Answer : A, C, F

The observations at the on-site visits that would justify writing a SAR/STR are signs of severe wear and poor maintenance at the site (A), lights turned off at the site during operational hours , and a full parking lot of cars with no staff at the site (F). These observations suggest that the daycare businesses are not operating legitimately or providing adequate services to their customers, and that they may be misusing governmental grants or laundering money through their accounts. These observations are consistent with some of the red flags for fraud identified by ACAMS2, such as:

Inadequate facilities or equipment for the type of business

Lack of visible activity or customers at the business location

Discrepancy between reported income and expenses

Unusual volume or frequency of transactions

The other observations are not as relevant or indicative of fraud as options A, C, and F. A site located in a commercial building (B) could be a normal or legitimate choice for a daycare business, depending on its size, location, and availability. Visible attendance with children being dropped off by parents (D) could show that the daycare business is providing genuine services to its customers, although it does not rule out possible fraud or money laundering. Visible signage indicating the purpose of building (E) could also show that the daycare business is transparent and legitimate, although it does not guarantee its quality or compliance.

Question 7

When crafting internal procedures on writing and submitting SARs/STRs, one should:

Ause internal keywords and standard industry terms to better provide context within which the suspicious activity was identified.

Bconsider the guidelines issued by the national financial intelligence unit {FIU) and local regulator and incorporate any country-specific requirements.

Cinclude attachments with the SARs/STRs as all information needs to be at the disposal of the financial intelligence unit (FIU)

Dadhere to home junsdiction guidelines across the whole group when local requirements of the country of operation and home jurisdiction conflict.

Answer : B

When writing and submitting SARs/STRs, one should consider the guidelines issued by the national financial intelligence unit (FIU) and local regulator and incorporate any country-specific requirements. This ensures that the reports are compliant with the relevant laws and regulations and provide useful information to the authorities. The other options are either incorrect or not best practices.

Acams CAMS-FCI Advanced CAMS-Financial Crimes Investigations Exam Practice Test