A website hosted on AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS) uses a private key to decrypt data received from a secure web platform. The private key is stored as an encrypted OSGi configuration on the AEM publishers using the OOTB AEM Crypto Support bundle. The architect has received reports from developers stating that while the feature works on the AEMaaCS environments, they fail to decrypt the data on the local development environment.
What two actions would the architect take to resolve the issue? (Choose two.)
Answer : A, C
On the release day, an AEM code deployment is done on AEM 6.5 on-prem. After the deployment was completed, the users were able to get into the Author instance with no issues. However, users are unable to access any of the sites on public domains. The users are seeing a "502 Bad Gateway" error.
What would be the potential cause of this issue?
Answer : C
An Architect is performing infrastructure and capacity planning for Author servers for a customer using AEM 6.5. Which two factors would lead the Architect to pick a multi-author instance architecture setup? (Choose two.)
Answer : B, C
''a multi-author instance architecture setup provides failover and load balancing for author servers. It also allows for scaling up the number of parallel authors who can work on the same content without affecting performance''.
Content editors are uploading and editing thousands of PDFs daily, and notice a slow down of the AEM system over time while searching for assets in the DAM. The PDFs content does not need to be searchable. What would the AEM architect do to improve performance?
Answer : A
A client was successfully moved from AEM 6.5 to AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS) environment. The Content Transfer Tool was used to transfer the content to the AEMaaCS environment. The developed components render different renditions based on the breakpoint of the pages. The users reported that newly uploaded assets are not rendering or missing.
What is the cause of this issue and how can it be resolved?
Answer : D
A client with an existing AEM 6.5 AMS (Adobe Managed Services) implementation wants to start selling its products in Mainland China.
The client owns a state-issued ICP (Internet Content Provider) license.
The client does not accept high-latency calls for uncached content.
The client does not accept content being potentially blocked by a Chinese firewall.
The client wants to have an in-China hosting solution.
What option would the AEM architect recommend to cover the scenario above?
Answer : C
A media company surveys the end users of their AEM Sites website. The survey identifies that it is difficult to locate content on the site due to lack of relevancy and slow performance when navigating through the large volume of content.
To address both issues, the business team suggests integrating an innovative taxonomy product to the company s AEM implementation. The product is new on
the market and the development team has no experience with the technology.
Which two steps should an Architect recommend to evaluate this new feature? (Choose two.)
Answer : A, E
''developing a proof of concept with sample content allows for testing the feasibility and performance of the integration without affecting production data. Testing usability with selected end users allows for validating the relevancy and user satisfaction of the feature''.