Adobe AD0-E902 Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer Professional Exam Practice Test

Answer : B, C, D

Workfront's training on scenario testing emphasizes the importance of a well-structured test plan to ensure scenario reliability and accuracy. The three essential elements include:

B . Description of Expected Behavior:

This provides clarity on what the scenario is supposed to achieve when executed successfully.

It serves as a benchmark for evaluating the outcome of test executions.

C . Specific Event/Trigger per Scenario:

Identifying and testing specific triggers ensures that the scenario starts under the correct conditions.

This is crucial for verifying the proper configuration of the scenario's start point.

D . Description of Testing Steps:

Outlining step-by-step instructions for the testing process ensures that all aspects of the scenario are tested systematically.

It helps identify potential bottlenecks or areas for improvement in the scenario's configuration.

Why Not Other Options?

A . Roadmap requirements: This pertains to project planning and is not directly relevant to scenario testing.

Workfront Training Materials: Best Practices for Scenario Testing

Experience League Documentation: How to Design and Execute a Test Plan for Workfront Fusion Scenarios

Answer : B

Understanding the Requirement:

The user wants to upload a document into Workfront and attach it to a specific task.

This action involves creating a document in Workfront and associating it with a task as a related record.

Why Option B is Correct:

The Upload Document module is specifically designed for uploading files into Workfront.

It includes the ability to set a related record (e.g., a task, project, or issue) to which the document will be attached.

This ensures the document is uploaded and correctly linked to the task in a single operation.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option A ('Create Record for Document Version after Create Record for the document on the task'):

This involves multiple steps, which are unnecessary. The Upload Document module already handles both the upload and the attachment in one action.

Option C ('Create Record of Document type while setting the related record'):

The Create Record module is not designed for file uploads. It only creates metadata records, not the actual document.

Option D ('Miscellaneous Action to attach document to a task'):

There is no Miscellaneous Action specifically for attaching a document to a task. The Upload Document module is the appropriate choice.

Steps to Upload a Document in Workfront Fusion:

Add the Upload Document module to the scenario.

Specify the file to upload (e.g., from a previous module like Google Drive or an HTTP request).

Set the related record to the target task by providing its ID.

Run the scenario to upload and attach the document to the task.

Reference and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion: Upload Document Module

Workfront Community: Best Practices for Document Management in Fusion

The Upload Document module is the most efficient and accurate method for uploading and attaching a document to a task in Workfront.

Answer : B

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Understanding the Problem:

The scenario is triggered by a project status update.

After the scenario runs, it updates the project status again, which re-triggers the scenario, creating a loop.

The goal is to prevent the scenario from re-triggering itself.

Option Analysis:

A . When using instant triggers, finish the scenario with the Break directive to prevent the record from being updated again:

Incorrect. The Break directive is not used to prevent updates; it is used to stop further iterations of a scenario. It does not address the root cause of the loop, which is the re-triggering by updated records.

B . Create a filter after the instant trigger that only passes records that have not been updated by Fusion:

Correct. Adding a filter ensures that only records not recently updated by Fusion are processed. This prevents Fusion from re-triggering itself on the same record.

For example, you could use a condition to check if the Last Updated By field does not equal the Fusion user or if the Last Update Date is older than a certain threshold.

C . Schedule the instant trigger to only run at intervals to prevent Fusion from thinking the record has been updated after each run:

Incorrect. Instant triggers are event-driven, and their purpose is to respond to changes immediately. Scheduling them would negate the benefit of instant triggers and does not solve the root problem.

Why Filtering Records is Best:

Targeted Control: A filter after the trigger ensures only relevant updates (e.g., those not caused by Fusion) are processed.

Prevents Loops: By excluding records updated by Fusion, the scenario avoids re-triggering itself.

Maintains Performance: Filtering prevents unnecessary processing of irrelevant records, improving efficiency.

How to Implement:

After the instant trigger module, add a filter module.

Configure the filter to check the Last Updated By field or a custom flag indicating if the update was performed by Fusion.

Example: Last Updated By Fusion User or Update Flag True.

If a custom flag is used, ensure the flag is set when Fusion updates the record.

Alternative Solutions:

Add a custom field (e.g., 'Updated by Fusion') that Fusion sets when it updates a record. This can also be used in the filter condition.

Reference: This approach aligns with Fusion best practices for preventing infinite loops caused by scenarios re-triggering themselves. Filtering ensures the scenario runs only when necessary, avoiding redundant processing and maintaining performance.

Answer : B

Understanding the Array and the Task:

Input Array (Colors):

[

{ 'ID': '22342', 'name': 'Red' },

{ 'ID': '33495', 'name': 'Blue' }

]

Goal: Extract the first ID from the array, which is '22342'.

Why Option B is Correct:

The expression get(map(2.Colors; ID); 1):

map(2.Colors; ID): Iterates over the array 2.Colors and extracts the ID field from each object. This creates a new array containing just the IDs: ['22342', '33495'].

get(...; 1): Retrieves the first element of the newly created array, which is '22342'.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option A (map(2.Colors; ID; ID; 1)):

This syntax is invalid because the additional ID and 1 parameters are misplaced. The map function requires only two arguments: the array and the field to map.

Option C (map(get(2.Colors; ID); 1)):

This incorrectly attempts to use get inside map. The get function does not return a field for mapping, so the syntax is invalid.

How the Expression Works:

Step 1: map(2.Colors; ID)

Extracts the ID field from each object in the Colors array.

Output: ['22342', '33495'].

Step 2: get(...; 1)

Retrieves the first element of the mapped array.

Output: '22342'.

Use Case in Workfront Fusion:

This approach is commonly used when processing arrays in Fusion scenarios, ensuring specific elements are accessed without additional looping or complex logic.

Reference and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation

Workfront Community: Using Map and Get Functions

By combining map and get, this expression efficiently extracts the first ID from the array, ensuring correct and reliable results.

Answer : C

Understanding the Scenario:

The scenario includes two modules:

Workfront Search Module: Fetches data (likely project details).

Tools Module: Manipulates and sets multiple variables.

What the Images Show:

Workfront Search Module (First Module):

The output indicates 29 bundles of project data were retrieved.

Each bundle contains fields such as ID, name, and plannedCompletionDate.

Tools Module (Second Module):

The data from the Workfront module is processed to set variables like Project Name and Project Due Date.

Output includes transformed values, such as appending the approver's name ('Joan Harris') to the project name and updating the project due date.

Why Option C is Correct:

Delivery of 29 Bundles: The Workfront module retrieved 29 project bundles and passed them to the Tools module.

Data Manipulation in Tools Module: The second module modified the data, such as appending 'Joan Harris' to the project name and updating the due date to a different value. This is evident from the changes in the output of the Tools module compared to the input from the Workfront module.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option A:

Incorrect because the Workfront module retrieved 29 bundles, not just 1 bundle. Additionally, the project name and planned completion date were manipulated in the second module, not the first.

Option B:

Incorrect because the retrieved data pertains to projects, not tasks.

Option D:

Incorrect because the input and output fields in the Tools module are not identical. The data was clearly manipulated within the Tools module.

How This Scenario Operates:

The Workfront module fetches raw data, which is then processed in the Tools module. The processed variables (e.g., modified project names and due dates) are prepared for further use in subsequent scenario steps.

Reference and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Bundle Inspector

Workfront Community: Using Tools Module for Data Manipulation

The correct interpretation is that the first module delivered 29 bundles to the second module, where data manipulations occurred to modify the project name and planned completion date.

Answer : A

In this scenario, the error consistently arises due to the unavailability of a third-party service during high traffic times. This is a temporary issue and does not indicate a problem with the data or process. The recommended approach in such cases is to configure the scenario to retry failed executions:

Update Scenario Settings:

In Workfront Fusion, you can configure scenarios to automatically retry a failed execution.

This option ensures that temporary issues, like service unavailability, are retried after a delay, reducing the chances of the scenario being stopped permanently.

This is particularly useful when dealing with network traffic spikes or third-party API throttling.

Why Not Other Options?

B . Update the Module settings to automatically ignore failed executions: Ignoring failed executions would cause incomplete or incorrect data to flow through the scenario, leading to potential downstream issues.

C . Add an error handler to the Module and select a Break directive: While error handlers are useful, the Break directive stops the scenario from processing further, which is not ideal for a temporary issue.

D . Add an additional route after the failing module with a repeater: Adding a repeater increases complexity and is unnecessary when the retry option is already available in scenario settings.

Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Scenario Settings and Error Handling

Experience League Community: Handling API Rate Limits and Errors in Workfront Fusion

Answer : A, C

When encountering the error 429: Too many requests, which indicates the web service is being overwhelmed by requests, the following actions can help:

A . Add a Sleep Module:

Adding a Sleep module introduces a delay between iterations, reducing the frequency of API calls.

By slowing down the rate of requests, you avoid hitting the rate limits of the web service, thus reducing the chances of receiving a 429 error.

This approach is useful for managing high-volume iterations without overloading the external service.

C . Add a Module to Test the Service for Errors:

Adding a module to test the service's response before making a call can help prevent the 429 error by checking if the service is ready to handle requests.

This preemptive check allows the scenario to conditionally execute, ensuring that it doesn't overwhelm the service and respects the API rate limits.

Why Not Other Options?

B . Use an Ignore Directive: Ignoring errors can be risky because it would cause the scenario to ignore 429 errors, possibly leading to failed API calls that are not addressed. Ignoring an error doesn't solve the issue of too many requests being sent to the service.

D . Use a Break Directive: The Break directive would stop the execution, which is counterproductive when trying to resolve the issue by reducing the rate of requests. It would not address the root cause of too many requests.

Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Handling API Rate Limiting with Sleep and Error Handling

Experience League Community: Managing Web Service Errors in High-Volume Iterations