Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer Professional AD0-E902 Exam Practice Test

Answer : B

Understanding the Requirement:

The user needs to view the exact API request and the corresponding response a module executes in Adobe Workfront Fusion.

This is critical for debugging, troubleshooting, or validating API operations within scenarios.

Why Option B is Correct:

Execution History:

The execution history logs detailed information about every module that runs in a scenario.

It provides access to the API request sent, including the headers, parameters, and body.

It also displays the API response received, including HTTP status codes, returned data, and error messages (if applicable).

This feature is indispensable for debugging and verifying the behavior of modules.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option A ('Using the Bundle Inspector'):

The Bundle Inspector provides a view of processed data bundles but does not include API request/response details.

Option C ('Using the Fusion DevTool scenario debugger'):

Fusion does not have a specific 'DevTool debugger.' The execution history serves this purpose.

Option D ('Using the Fusion DevTool error evaluator'):

While error logs help evaluate issues, they do not directly show the API request/response unless an error occurs. Execution history is a more comprehensive source of this data.

Steps to View Execution History:

Run the scenario or inspect a previously executed scenario.

Navigate to the Execution History tab for the scenario.

Select a specific module to view its details.

Inspect the API request and response, which includes all relevant parameters and data.

Reference and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Execution History

Workfront Community: Debugging with Execution History

Answer : B

When dealing with intermittent errors, such as 'service is not reachable,' the default error handling in Adobe Workfront Fusion is often sufficient to improve execution success rates.

Default Error Handling:

Fusion automatically retries operations when transient errors, such as network or connection issues, occur.

By leveraging this built-in functionality, the system will attempt to re-execute the failing module after a brief delay, which is often enough for the external service to become reachable again.

Why Not Other Options?

A . Adding an error handler that will notify the system owner: While notifying the owner can be useful for monitoring purposes, it does not directly address improving the success rate of executions.

C . Adding a Break directive to the module: Adding a Break directive will stop the execution entirely, which is counterproductive in this case, as the service typically becomes reachable again after a short time.

Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Default Error Handling Mechanisms

Experience League Community: Managing Intermittent API Errors in Fusion

Answer : A

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Problem Summary:

The scenario has become too large due to the high number of modules.

The goal is to reduce the number of modules by optimizing how data is transformed.

Option Analysis:

A . Nesting multiple mapping panel functions:

Nesting multiple functions in the mapping panel (e.g., using if(), concat(), replace()) eliminates the need for separate modules to set and reset variables for each transformation.

This is a highly efficient technique to transform data in fewer modules, making it the correct answer.

B . Using a Compose a string module and Text Parser:

This involves additional modules (Compose a string + Text Parser) instead of reducing the number of modules. It is not an optimal solution to this problem.

C . Setting the scenario to Auto Commit:

The Auto Commit setting helps with transactional control and does not reduce the number of modules in a scenario.

Why Nesting Mapping Functions is Effective:

Efficiency: Complex transformations can be performed inline within a single mapping panel.

Readability: Proper nesting and naming conventions make it easier to understand the logic without adding unnecessary modules.

Scalability: This approach keeps the scenario compact and reduces complexity as the scenario grows.

How to Implement:

Open the mapping panel in relevant modules.

Use multiple nested functions like if(), concat(), add(), etc., within the mapping expressions.

Test the mapping thoroughly to ensure correctness.

Answer : A

In this scenario, the error consistently arises due to the unavailability of a third-party service during high traffic times. This is a temporary issue and does not indicate a problem with the data or process. The recommended approach in such cases is to configure the scenario to retry failed executions:

Update Scenario Settings:

In Workfront Fusion, you can configure scenarios to automatically retry a failed execution.

This option ensures that temporary issues, like service unavailability, are retried after a delay, reducing the chances of the scenario being stopped permanently.

This is particularly useful when dealing with network traffic spikes or third-party API throttling.

Why Not Other Options?

B . Update the Module settings to automatically ignore failed executions: Ignoring failed executions would cause incomplete or incorrect data to flow through the scenario, leading to potential downstream issues.

C . Add an error handler to the Module and select a Break directive: While error handlers are useful, the Break directive stops the scenario from processing further, which is not ideal for a temporary issue.

D . Add an additional route after the failing module with a repeater: Adding a repeater increases complexity and is unnecessary when the retry option is already available in scenario settings.

Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Scenario Settings and Error Handling

Experience League Community: Handling API Rate Limits and Errors in Workfront Fusion

Answer : C

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Problem Summary:

The Fusion scenario updates the project condition multiple times, once for each high-priority issue.

The desired behavior is to update the project condition only once, based on the overall condition of all associated issues.

Option Analysis:

A . Change the issue search module to result set of First Matching:

This would limit the search to only the first issue. However, this does not account for all issues on the project, leading to incomplete logic for setting the project condition.

B . Add an Ignore error directive as an error handler route for the update module:

Ignoring errors does not prevent multiple updates; it only suppresses errors in the workflow.

C . Create a separate scenario to update the overall project condition:

Correct. By separating the project update logic into a different scenario, the developer can ensure the condition is updated only once after analyzing all issues. The project condition is calculated holistically, based on the state of all high-priority issues.

D . Apply the Run Once flow control function:

'Run Once' controls execution at the scenario level, not within a module's iteration. It cannot prevent multiple updates in this context.

Why Separate Scenario is Best:

Simplifies Logic: A separate scenario can be designed to run after all issues have been checked, ensuring only one update per project.

Avoids Redundancy: Prevents unnecessary API calls to update the same project multiple times.

Improves Performance: Reduces the number of operations and bundles processed in the main scenario.

Implementation:

Create a separate scenario triggered after the issue-checking scenario completes.

Use aggregate data (e.g., a data store or intermediate processing) to evaluate the overall project condition before performing a single update.

Answer : A, C

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Best Practices for Scenario Clarity:

Workfront Fusion scenarios can become complex. Adopting practices that enhance readability, shareability, and understanding ensures the scenario can be maintained and used effectively by others.

Option Analysis:

A . Naming all modules by providing short but relevant labels:

Correct. Proper naming helps identify the function of each module at a glance. For example, instead of generic names like 'Project Search,' use 'Search High Priority Projects.'

This makes it easier to debug, share, and update the scenario.

B . Insert Note Modules at the beginning of the scenario:

Incorrect. While notes are useful, inserting a Note module at the beginning is not always necessary unless clarification is required for the initial step. Adding notes throughout the scenario (Option C) is more beneficial.

C . Add notes where applicable to clarify what is happening:

Correct. Adding comments or notes helps explain the purpose of certain steps, making the scenario easier to understand for collaborators or when revisiting it in the future.

D . Attach the requirements document using the scenario settings:

Incorrect. Attaching a requirements document might be useful for reference but does not directly contribute to scenario readability or understanding within the interface.

Implementation Tips:

Use descriptive names for modules that clearly indicate their purpose (e.g., 'Update Project Status' instead of 'Update Record').

Add comments or notes at decision points or complex mapping expressions to explain logic.

Answer : C, C

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Scenario Context:

The goal is to assign a user to all tasks on a project where the role is Copywriter.

The chosen method should minimize the number of operations to ensure efficiency.

Option Analysis:

A . Searching for all assignments in the project where the role is Copywriter and add the user to each assignment:

This approach involves searching assignments, iterating through them, and adding the user individually. Each iteration generates multiple operations, making it less efficient.

B . Searching for Tasks in the project with the Copywriter role and assign the user to each task:

Similar to Option A, this approach also requires iterating through tasks and assigning users one by one, resulting in a higher number of operations.