Amazon MLS-C01 AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty AWS ML Specialty Exam Practice Test

Answer : C

Amazon Personalize is a fully managed machine learning service that makes it easy for developers to create personalized user experiences at scale. It uses the same recommender system technology that Amazon uses to create its own personalized recommendations. Amazon Personalize provides several pre-built recipes that can be used to train models for different use cases. The USER_PERSONALIZATION recipe is designed to provide personalized recommendations for existing users based on their past interactions with items. The PERSONALIZED_RANKING recipe is designed to re-rank a list of items for a user based on their preferences. The USER_PERSONALIZATION recipe is more suitable for this use case because it can generate recommendations for each user without requiring a list of candidate items. To filter out the items that the user previously purchased, a real-time filter can be created and applied to the campaign. A real-time filter is a dynamic filter that uses the latest interaction data to exclude items from the recommendations. By using Amazon Personalize, the development effort is minimized because it handles the data processing, model training, and deployment automatically. The web application can use the GetRecommendations API operation to get the real-time recommendations from the campaign.References:

Amazon Personalize

What is Amazon Personalize?

USER_PERSONALIZATION recipe

PERSONALIZED_RANKING recipe

Filtering recommendations

GetRecommendations API operation

Answer : B

In linear least squares regression, the design matrix (often denoted as XXX) must have full rank to ensure a unique solution. When two or more features are perfectly linearly dependent, it leads to multicollinearity, causing the matrix XTXX^TXXTX to become singular (non-invertible). This singularity prevents the computation of a unique solution for the regression coefficients.

From the documentation:

Answer : D, E

The best indicators that an ML-based solution is suitable for this scenario are D and E, because they imply that the historical sensor data is sufficient and relevant for building a predictive maintenance model.This model can use machine learning techniques such as regression, classification, or anomaly detection to learn from the past data and forecast future failures or issues12.Having high granularity and diversity of data can improve the accuracy and generalization of the model, as well as enable the detection of complex patterns and relationships that are not captured by simple rule-based thresholds3.

The other options are not good indicators that an ML-based solution is suitable, because they suggest that the historical sensor data is incomplete, inconsistent, or inadequate for building a predictive maintenance model.These options would require additional data collection, preprocessing, or augmentation to overcome the data quality issues and ensure that the model can handle different scenarios and types of cranes4.

References:

1:Machine Learning Techniques for Predictive Maintenance

2:A Guide to Predictive Maintenance & Machine Learning

3:Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance: Reinventing Asset Upkeep

4:Predictive Maintenance with Machine Learning: A Complete Guide

: [Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance - AWS Online Tech Talks]

Answer : C

The best solution to reduce the cost of the notebook instance and the data preprocessing job is to change the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance, stop the notebook when it is not in use, and run data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing. This solution will result in the most cost savings because:

Changing the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance will reduce the hourly cost of running the notebook, since the feature engineering development does not require high CPU and memory resources.For example, an ml.t3.medium instance costs $0.0464 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance costs $0.888 per hour1.

Stopping the notebook when it is not in use will also reduce the cost, since the notebook will only incur charges when it is running.For example, if the notebook is used for 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, then stopping it when it is not in use will save about 76% of the monthly cost compared to leaving it running all the time2.

Running data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the ml.r5 instance is optimized for memory-intensive workloads and has a lower cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 instance.For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 128 GB of memory and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Therefore, the ml.r5.4xlarge instance can process the same amount of data in half the time and at a lower cost than the ml.m5.4xlarge instance. Moreover, using Amazon SageMaker Processing will allow the data preprocessing job to run on a separate, fully managed infrastructure that can be scaled up or down as needed, without affecting the notebook instance.

The other options are not as effective as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not optimal because changing the notebook instance type to a memory optimized instance with the same vCPU number as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance has will not reduce the cost of the notebook, since the memory optimized instances have a higher cost per vCPU than the general-purpose instances.For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, running both data preprocessing and feature engineering development on the same instance will not take advantage of the scalability and flexibility of Amazon SageMaker Processing.

Option B is not suitable because running data preprocessing on a P3 instance type with the same memory as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the P3 instance type is optimized for GPU-based workloads and has a higher cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 or ml.r5 instance types.For example, an ml.p3.2xlarge instance has 61 GB of memory and costs $3.06 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, the data preprocessing job does not require GPU, so using a P3 instance type will be wasteful and inefficient.

Option D is not feasible because running data preprocessing on an R5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using the Reserved Instance option will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the Reserved Instance option requires a commitment to a consistent amount of usage for a period of 1 or 3 years3. However, the data preprocessing job only runs once a day on average and completes in only 2 hours, so it does not have a consistent or predictable usage pattern. Therefore, using the Reserved Instance option will not provide any cost savings and may incur additional charges for unused capacity.

References:

Amazon SageMaker Pricing

Manage Notebook Instances - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon EC2 Pricing - Reserved Instances

Answer : A

The task involves periodic inference (hourly batches of telemetry data) that can be processed in bulk, with the total processing time under 5 minutes. The most cost-effective solution for this batch prediction scenario is SageMaker Batch Transform, as it avoids the need for always-on endpoints.

''Use Batch Transform when you: ... Don't need a persistent endpoint and want to process batches of data at once. This is typically the most cost-efficient way to process large volumes of input data periodically.''

Answer : B

Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. SageMaker provides a variety of tools and frameworks to support the entire machine learning workflow, from data preparation to model deployment.

One of the tools that SageMaker offers is the Amazon SageMaker Python SDK, which is a high-level library that simplifies the interaction with SageMaker APIs and services. The SageMaker Python SDK allows you to write code in Python and use popular frameworks such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, MXNet, and more. You can use the SageMaker Python SDK to create and manage SageMaker resources such as notebook instances, training jobs, endpoints, and feature store.

If you need to continue working on a TensorFlow project using SageMaker for training without Wi-Fi access, the best approach is to download the TensorFlow Docker container used in SageMaker from GitHub to your local environment, and use the SageMaker Python SDK to test the code. This way, you can ensure that your code is compatible with the SageMaker environment and avoid any potential issues when you upload your code to SageMaker and start the training job. You can also use the same code to deploy your model to a SageMaker endpoint when you have Wi-Fi access again.

To download the TensorFlow Docker container used in SageMaker, you can visit theSageMaker Docker GitHub repositoryand follow the instructions to build the image locally. You can also use theSageMaker Studio Image Build CLIto automate the process of building and pushing the Docker image to Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR). To use the SageMaker Python SDK to test the code, you can install the SDK on your local machine by following theinstallation guide. You can also refer to the TensorFlow documentation for more details on how to use the SageMaker Python SDK with TensorFlow.

References:

SageMaker Docker GitHub repository

SageMaker Studio Image Build CLI

SageMaker Python SDK installation guide

SageMaker Python SDK TensorFlow documentation

Answer : C

Quantile binning is a data transformation technique that can be used to handle skewed and non-linear numerical features. It divides the range of a feature into equal-sized bins based on the percentiles of the data. Each bin is assigned a numerical value that represents the midpoint of the bin. This way, the feature values are transformed into a more uniform distribution that can improve the performance of linear models. Quantile binning can also reduce the impact of outliers and noise in the data.

One-hot encoding, Cartesian product transformation, and normalization are not suitable for this scenario. One-hot encoding is used to transform categorical features into binary features. Cartesian product transformation is used to create new features by combining existing features. Normalization is used to scale numerical features to a standard range, but it does not change the shape of the distribution.References:

Data Transformations for Machine Learning

Quantile Binning Transformation