APICS Certified in Planning and Inventory Management (Part 2) CPIM-Part-2 Exam Practice Test

Answer : C

When a certified supplier's delivery performance declines, a company should respond initially by communicating with the supplier to investigate the source of the problem. A certified supplier is a supplier that has met certain quality, delivery, and service standards and has been approved by the company to supply goods or services without inspection or testing. A certified supplier is expected to maintain a high level of performance and reliability, as well as to report any issues or deviations that may affect the delivery process. However, sometimes a certified supplier may experience a decline in delivery performance, which can cause delays, disruptions, or dissatisfaction for the company and its customers.

The best way to deal with a decline in delivery performance from a certified supplier is to communicate with the supplier and find out the root cause of the problem. Communication is essential for maintaining a good relationship with the supplier and for resolving any issues or conflicts that may arise. Communication can help the company and the supplier to understand each other's expectations, needs, and challenges, as well as to identify and implement corrective actions or preventive measures. Communication can also help to restore trust and confidence between the parties and to prevent further deterioration of performance.

Tightening performance criteria for the supplier is not an appropriate initial response when a certified supplier's delivery performance declines. Tightening performance criteria means imposing stricter standards or requirements on the supplier, such as reducing lead times, increasing penalties, or demanding more frequent reports. Tightening performance criteria may seem like a way of holding the supplier accountable and motivating them to improve their performance, but it can also have negative consequences. Tightening performance criteria can create more pressure and stress for the supplier, which can affect their quality, productivity, or morale. It can also damage the relationship with the supplier, as it may signal a lack of trust, respect, or cooperation from the company.

Establishing a temporary buffer of finished goods inventory at the supplier is not an effective initial response when a certified supplier's delivery performance declines. Establishing a temporary buffer of finished goods inventory means storing extra units of products at the supplier's location to compensate for any delays or shortages in delivery. Establishing a temporary buffer of finished goods inventory may seem like a way of ensuring availability and continuity of supply, but it can also have drawbacks. Establishing a temporary buffer of finished goods inventory can increase inventory costs, such as holding costs, transportation costs, or obsolescence costs. It can also reduce inventory visibility and control, as it may be difficult to track or manage the inventory at the supplier's location. Moreover, establishing a temporary buffer of finished goods inventory does not address the root cause of the decline in delivery performance, but rather masks or postpones it.

Increasing the standard lead time of the component to allow for supplier delays is not a suitable initial response when a certified supplier's delivery performance declines. Increasing the standard lead time of the component means extending the time between placing an order and receiving it from the supplier. Increasing the standard lead time of the component may seem like a way of adjusting to the decline in delivery performance and avoiding late deliveries, but it can also have disadvantages. Increasing the standard lead time of the component can reduce customer satisfaction and loyalty, as it may result in longer waiting times or missed deadlines for the customers. It can also reduce operational efficiency and flexibility, as it may limit the ability to respond to changes in demand or supply. Furthermore, increasing the standard lead time of the component does not solve the problem of the decline in delivery performance, but rather accepts or tolerates it.

Answer : A

A two-bin system is a type of inventory management technique that uses two containers or bins to store and replenish items. When the first bin is empty, the second bin is used to supply the demand while the first bin is reordered. A two-bin system is most responsive to changes in demand levels because it triggers replenishment orders based on actual consumption rather than fixed time intervals or reorder points. A two-bin system can reduce stockouts, improve service levels, and lower inventory costs.Reference: CPIM Exam Content Manual Version 7.0, Domain 5: Plan and Manage Inventory, Section 5.2: Implement Inventory Plans, Subsection 5.2.3: Describe how to implement inventory replenishment techniques (page 46).

Answer : D

Available capacity is the difference between the required capacity and planned operating capacity1.It refers to how capable the resources in an organization are in formulating and implementing strategy1.To calculate available capacity, factors such as the number of machines or workers, the number of shifts, utilization, and efficiency are considered1. Efficiency, in particular, is a crucial factor as it measures how effectively resources are used to produce output.It is calculated as the ratio of actual output to standard output within a specific time period1. Therefore, efficiency directly impacts available capacity by determining how much output can be produced with the available resources and time.

The other options, while important in production and operations management, are not directly used to calculate available capacity:

Productivity measures the output per unit of input and is more about overall performance rather than available capacity.

Load refers to the amount of work assigned to a resource or facility but does not directly indicate available capacity.

Yield measures the percentage of products that meet quality standards out of total units produced but does not directly calculate available capacity.

Answer : B

Liability risk in the supply chain is the risk that a company may be held legally responsible for damages caused by its products or services, or by its business partners, such as suppliers, subcontractors, or customers1.Liability risk can result in financial losses, legal penalties, reputational damage, and customer dissatisfaction1.

One way to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain is to require traceability for components, which means the ability to track the origin, history, location, and status of a product or its parts throughout the supply chain2.Traceability can help a company to identify and prevent potential quality issues, defects, recalls, counterfeits, or frauds that may cause harm to the customers or the environment2.Traceability can also help a company to comply with regulatory standards, customer requirements, and social responsibility expectations2.Traceability can be achieved by using various methods, such as barcodes, RFID tags, serial numbers, blockchain, or cloud-based platforms3.

The other options are not effective ways to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain. Negotiating lower component cost may reduce the procurement expenses, but it may also compromise the quality and safety of the components, which may increase the liability risk. Pushing inventory to supplier locations may reduce the inventory carrying costs and risks, but it may also increase the dependency and vulnerability on the suppliers, which may expose the company to more liability risk. Using LTL shipments more frequently may reduce the transportation costs and emissions, but it may also increase the handling and damage risks of the products, which may affect the customer satisfaction and liability.

Answer : D

Capable-to-promise (CTP) is a method of order promising that considers both material and capacity availability. CTP is more appropriate than available-to-promise (ATP), which only considers material availability, in environments where the production process is complex, customized, or resource-intensive, and where the demand is uncertain or variable. CTP can provide more accurate and realistic delivery dates, as well as optimize the use of resources and reduce inventory costs.

Among the options given, specialty chemicals packaged and shipped to order is the most suitable environment for CTP. This is because specialty chemicals are often produced in small batches or on demand, according to the specific requirements and preferences of each customer. Therefore, the production process requires high flexibility and customization, as well as careful coordination of materials and capacity. The demand for specialty chemicals may also vary depending on the market conditions and customer needs. CTP can help the company to promise delivery dates that take into account the availability of both materials and capacity, as well as the production lead time and transportation time.

The other options are less suitable for CTP, as they are more likely to use standard or mass production processes, where the products are made in large quantities or in advance, and where the demand is more stable or predictable. In these environments, ATP may be sufficient to promise delivery dates based on material availability alone, without considering capacity constraints.

Answer : D

The output of the equipment on Day 6 can be calculated by multiplying the demonstrated capacity, the utilization, and the efficiency. The demonstrated capacity is given as $1,200 per day. The utilization is the ratio of the actual time that the equipment is used to the available time that it could be used. Since the utilization is reduced by 25% on Day 6, it means that the equipment is used for 75% of the available time. Therefore, the utilization is 0.75. The efficiency is the ratio of the actual output to the standard output. It is given as 110%, which means that the equipment produces 10% more than the standard output. Therefore, the efficiency is 1.1. The output on Day 6 can be found by multiplying these three factors:

Output = Demonstrated capacity x Utilization x Efficiency Output = $1,200 x 0.75 x 1.1 Output = $990

Therefore, the output on Day 6 is $990.Reference: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 7.0, Domain 6: Plan, Manage, and Execute Detailed Schedules, Section A: Detailed Capacity Planning and Scheduling, Subsection 2: Capacity Management Concepts and Calculations, p. 37-38.

Answer : C

Staging in a manual system corresponds to dispatching in a computer system.Staging is the process of preparing and moving materials or components to the point of use or consumption in a production system1.Staging can be done manually by workers who physically move the items from storage areas to workstations, or automatically by conveyors, robots, or other devices2.Dispatching is the process of authorizing and releasing work orders or tasks to the production system3.Dispatching can be done manually by supervisors who assign work to workers, or automatically by computer systems that use algorithms or rules to prioritize and schedule work4. Both staging and dispatching are functions that facilitate the flow of materials and information in a production system and ensure that the right items are available at the right time and place.