APICS Certified in Planning and Inventory Management (Part 2) CPIM-Part-2 Exam Questions

Page: 1 / 14
Total 151 questions
Question 1

The results from responding to uncertainty in the supply chain by exaggerating lead times and increasing lot sizes is called:



Answer : A

The results from responding to uncertainty in the supply chain by exaggerating lead times and increasing lot sizes is called the bullwhip effect. The bullwhip effect is a phenomenon that occurs when small changes in demand at the downstream end of the supply chain (such as retailers or customers) cause larger and larger fluctuations in demand at the upstream end of the supply chain (such as wholesalers, distributors, or manufacturers). The bullwhip effect can create inefficiencies, waste, and costs in the supply chain, as well as reduce customer satisfaction and profitability.

One of the causes of the bullwhip effect is the response to uncertainty in the supply chain by exaggerating lead times and increasing lot sizes. Lead time is the time between placing an order and receiving it from a supplier. Lot size is the quantity of units ordered or produced at a time. When there is uncertainty or variability in demand or supply, such as due to seasonality, promotions, disruptions, or forecasting errors, some supply chain members may try to cope by exaggerating lead times and increasing lot sizes. For example, a retailer may increase its safety stock or reorder point to avoid stockouts or delays, or a manufacturer may produce more than needed to take advantage of economies of scale or discounts. However, these actions can have unintended consequences, as they can distort the demand information and amplify the demand variability along the supply chain. This can result in excess inventory, low inventory turnover, high holding costs, poor service levels, lost sales, obsolete products, or capacity issues.

To prevent or reduce the bullwhip effect caused by responding to uncertainty in the supply chain by exaggerating lead times and increasing lot sizes, some possible solutions are:

Improving communication and collaboration among supply chain members to share accurate and timely demand information and forecasts.

Reducing lead times and lot sizes by using lean production techniques, just-in-time inventory systems, or quick response methods.

Implementing vendor-managed inventory (VMI) systems, where suppliers are responsible for managing and replenishing the inventory of their customers based on their actual consumption data.

Adopting advanced technologies, such as radio-frequency identification (RFID), artificial intelligence (AI), or blockchain, to enhance visibility, traceability, and coordination in the supply chain.


Question 2

The horizon for forecasts that are input to the sales and operations planning (S&O0P) process should be long enough that:



Answer : C

The horizon for forecasts that are input to the sales and operations planning (S&OP) process should be long enough that required resources can be properly planned. The S&OP process is a cross-functional process that aligns the demand and supply plans of an organization. The S&OP process consists of several steps, such as data gathering, demand planning, supply planning, pre-S&OP meeting, executive S&OP meeting, and S&OP implementation. The output of the S&OP process is the production plan, which is a statement of the resources needed to meet the aggregate demand plan over a medium-term horizon. The production plan can be stated in different units of measure depending on the type of manufacturing environment, such as hours, units, tons, or dollars. The horizon for forecasts that are input to the S&OP process should be long enough that required resources can be properly planned, meaning that the organization can anticipate and allocate the necessary capacity, materials, labor, equipment, and facilities to meet the expected demand. The horizon for forecasts should also match the lead time for acquiring or changing the resources, as well as the planning cycle for updating the production plan.


Question 3

Components of an organization's immediate industry and competitive environment include:



Answer : C

An organization's immediate industry and competitive environment includes the factors that directly affect its ability to compete and achieve its goals.These factors are often analyzed using Porter's Five Forces model, which identifies five competitive forces that shape the industry: threat of new entrants, power of suppliers, power of buyers, threat of substitute products, and rivalry among existing competitors1. Among these forces, substitute products are the most relevant component of the immediate industry and competitive environment, as they represent the alternative solutions that customers can choose instead of the organization's products.Substitute products can reduce the demand and profitability of the organization's products, as well as increase the price sensitivity and bargaining power of customers1.

The other options are not components of the immediate industry and competitive environment, but rather components of the general or macro environment.The general or macro environment includes the broader factors that affect all organizations in a society or a market, such as political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors2.These factors are often analyzed using PESTEL analysis, which helps organizations identify the opportunities and threats arising from the external environment2.Among these factors, political factors include the government policies, regulations, and stability that affect the organization's operations and decisions2.Interest rates are part of the economic factors that include the market conditions, growth, inflation, unemployment, and exchange rates that affect the organization's performance and profitability2.Sociocultural forces are part of the social factors that include the demographics, values, beliefs, lifestyles, and preferences of the customers and society that affect the organization's demand and customer satisfaction2.


Question 4

In the design and development of a manufacturing process, process engineers would most likely be responsible for decisions relating to:



Answer : D


Question 5

Which of the following circumstances would cause a move from acceptance sampling to 100% inspection?



Answer : C

A move from acceptance sampling to 100% inspection would be caused by the circumstance of downstream operators encountering recurring defects. Acceptance sampling is a quality control technique that uses statistical sampling to determine whether to accept or reject a production lot of material.It is employed when one or several of the following hold: testing is destructive; the cost of 100% inspection is very high; and 100% inspection takes too long1. 100% inspection is a quality control technique that examines every item in a production lot for defects or nonconformities.It is employed when the cost of passing a defective item is very high; testing is nondestructive; and 100% inspection does not take too long2.

Downstream operators are the workers or machines that perform the subsequent operations or processes on the products after they have been inspected or tested. Downstream operators encountering recurring defects means that the products that have passed the acceptance sampling or testing are still found to be defective or nonconforming by the downstream operators. This can indicate that the acceptance sampling or testing is not effective or reliable in detecting or preventing defects or nonconformities. This can also result in negative consequences, such as rework, waste, delays, customer complaints, or safety issues. Therefore, this circumstance would cause a move from acceptance sampling to 100% inspection, as it would require a more thorough and rigorous quality control technique to ensure that no defective or nonconforming products are passed to the downstream operators.

The other options are not circumstances that would cause a move from acceptance sampling to 100% inspection. History shows that the quality level has been stable from lot to lot is not a circumstance that would cause a move from acceptance sampling to 100% inspection, but rather a circumstance that would support the use of acceptance sampling. Quality level is the proportion of conforming items in a production lot. Quality level being stable from lot to lot means that there is little variation or fluctuation in the quality of the products over time. This can indicate that the production process is under control and consistent in meeting the quality standards or specifications. Therefore, this circumstance would support the use of acceptance sampling, as it would reduce the risk of accepting a defective lot or rejecting a conforming lot.

The company uses one of its qualified suppliers is not a circumstance that would cause a move from acceptance sampling to 100% inspection, but rather a circumstance that would support the use of acceptance sampling. A qualified supplier is a supplier that has met certain quality, delivery, and service standards and has been approved by the company to supply goods or services without inspection or testing. A qualified supplier is expected to maintain a high level of performance and reliability, as well as to report any issues or deviations that may affect the delivery process. Therefore, this circumstance would support the use of acceptance sampling, as it would reduce the need for 100% inspection by relying on the supplier's quality assurance system.

The percent of defects is expected to be greater than 5% is not a circumstance that would cause a move from acceptance sampling to 100% inspection, but rather a circumstance that would require a change in the acceptance sampling plan. The percent of defects is the proportion of defective items in a production lot. The percent of defects being expected to be greater than 5% means that there is a high probability of finding defective items in the production lot. This can indicate that the production process is out of control or inconsistent in meeting the quality standards or specifications. Therefore, this circumstance would require a change in the acceptance sampling plan, such as reducing the acceptable quality limit (AQL), increasing the sample size, or decreasing the acceptance number, to increase the likelihood of rejecting a defective lot.


Question 6

Which of the following priority rules is most consistent with the objective of meeting due dates?



Answer : D

The priority rule that is most consistent with the objective of meeting due dates is slack time per operation. Slack time per operation is a priority rule that assigns a priority index to each job based on the ratio of the remaining slack time to the remaining number of operations. Slack time is the difference between the due date and the expected completion time of a job. A lower ratio means a higher priority, as it indicates that the job has less slack time per operation and is more likely to be late. Slack time per operation is a dynamic priority rule, as it updates the priority index after each operation is completed. Slack time per operation can help minimize the number of tardy jobs and the average tardiness of jobs, as it gives preference to the jobs that are closer to their due dates and have more operations left.

First-come-first-served (FCFS) is not a priority rule that is consistent with the objective of meeting due dates. FCFS is a priority rule that processes jobs in the order of their arrival or release times. FCFS is a simple and fair rule, but it ignores the processing times and due dates of jobs. FCFS can result in poor due date performance, as it can delay urgent or short jobs behind long or non-urgent jobs.

Shortest processing time (SPT) is not a priority rule that is consistent with the objective of meeting due dates. SPT is a priority rule that processes jobs in ascending order of their processing times. SPT is an effective rule for minimizing the average flow time and work-in-process inventory of jobs, as it clears out small jobs quickly and reduces congestion in the system. However, SPT does not consider the due dates of jobs, and it can make long or urgent jobs late.

Fewest operations remaining is not a priority rule that is consistent with the objective of meeting due dates. Fewest operations remaining is a priority rule that processes jobs in ascending order of their remaining number of operations. Fewest operations remaining is a rule that can reduce the variability and complexity of jobs, as it tends to complete jobs faster and reduce their flow times. However, fewest operations remaining does not take into account the slack times or due dates of jobs, and it can make urgent or short jobs late.


Question 7

Which of the following inventory management techniques is most responsive to changes in demand levels?



Answer : A

A two-bin system is a type of inventory management technique that uses two containers or bins to store and replenish items. When the first bin is empty, the second bin is used to supply the demand while the first bin is reordered. A two-bin system is most responsive to changes in demand levels because it triggers replenishment orders based on actual consumption rather than fixed time intervals or reorder points. A two-bin system can reduce stockouts, improve service levels, and lower inventory costs.Reference: CPIM Exam Content Manual Version 7.0, Domain 5: Plan and Manage Inventory, Section 5.2: Implement Inventory Plans, Subsection 5.2.3: Describe how to implement inventory replenishment techniques (page 46).


Page:    1 / 14   
Total 151 questions