Arcitura Education SOA Design & Architecture Lab S90.09 Exam Practice Test

Page: 1 / 14
Total 40 questions

Want more questions? Get Premium Access.
()

Question 1

Service Consumer A sends a message to Service A (1), which then forwards the message to Service B (2). Service B forwards the message to Service C (3), which finally forwards the message to Service D (4). Services A, B, and C each contain logic that reads the content of the message and, based on this content, determines which service to forward the message to. As a result, what is shown in the Figure is one of several possible runtime scenarios.

You are told that the current service composition architecture is having performance problems because of two specific reasons. First, too many services need to be explicitly invoked in order for the message to arrive at its destination. Secondly, because each of the intermediary services is required to read the entire message contents in order to determine where to forward the message to, it is taking too long for the overall task to complete. What steps can be taken to solve these problems without sacrificing any of the functionality that currently exists?

AThe Intermediate Routing pattern can be applied together with the Service Agent pattern in order to establish a set of service agents capable of intercepting and forwarding the message based on pre-defined routing logic. To avoid the need for service agents to read the entire message contents, the Messaging Metadata pattern can be applied so that content relevant to the routing logic is placed in the header of a message. This way, only the message header content needs to be read by the service agents.

BThe Intermediate Routing pattern can be applied together with the Service Agent pattern in order to establish a set of service agents capable of intercepting and forwarding the message based on pre-defined routing logic. To avoid the need for service agents to read the entire message contents, the Rules Centralization pattern can be applied so that content relevant to the routing logic is isolated into a separate Rules service. This way, service agents are only required to access the Rules service in order to determine where to forward messages to. The Standardized Service Contract principle will need to be applied to ensure that the new Rules service and the new service agents provide service contracts that are compliant to existing design standards.

CThe Intermediate Routing pattern can be applied together with the Service Agent pattern in order to establish a set of service agents capable of intercepting and forwarding the message based on pre-defined routing logic. The Service Discoverability principle can be applied to improve the communications quality of message contents, which will reduce the time required by service agents to read the message contents at runtime.

DNone of the above.

Answer : A

Question 2

Service A is a utility service that provides generic data access logic to a database that contains data that is periodically replicated from a shared database (1). Because the Standardized Service Contract principle was applied to the design of Service A, its service contract has been fully standardized. Service A is being accessed by three service consumers. Service Consumer A accesses a component that is part of the Service A implementation by invoking it directly (2). Service Consumer B invokes Service A by accessing its service contract (3). Service Consumer C directly accesses the replicated database that is part of the Service A implementation (4).

You've been told that the reason Service Consumers A and C bypass the published Service A service contract is because, for security reasons, they are not allowed to access a subset of the operations in the WSDL definition that expresses the service contract. How can the Service A architecture be changed to enforce these security restrictions while avoiding negative forms of coupling?

AThe Contract Centralization pattern can be applied to force all service consumers to access the Service A architecture via its published service contract. This will prevent negative forms of coupling that could lead to problems when the database is replaced. The Service Abstraction principle can then be applied to hide underlying service architecture details so that future service consumers cannot be designed to access any part of the underlying service implementation.

BThe Contract Centralization pattern can be applied to force service consumers to access the Service A architecture via its published service contract only. The Service Loose Coupling principle can then be applied to ensure that the centralized service contract does not contain any content that is dependent on or derived from the underlying service implementation.

CThe Concurrent Contracts pattern can be applied to Service A in order to establish one or more alternative service contracts. This allows service consumers with different levels of security clearance to continue accessing the service logic via its published service contracts.

DNone of the above.

Answer : C

Question 3

The architecture for Service A displayed in the Figure shows how the core logic of Service A has expanded over time to connect to a database and a proprietary legacy system (1) and to support two separate service contracts (2) that are accessed by different service consumers. The service contracts are fully decoupled from the service logic. The service logic is therefore coupled to the service contracts and to the underlying implementation resources (the database and the legacy system). Service A currently has three service consumers. Service Consumer A and Service Consumer B access Service A's two service contracts (3, 4). Service Consumer C bypasses the service contracts and accesses the service logic directly (5).

You are told that the database and legacy system that are currently being used by Service A are being replaced with different products. The two service contracts are completely decoupled from the core service logic, but there is still a concern that the introduction of the new products will cause the core service logic to behave differently than before. What steps can be taken to change the Service A architecture in preparation for the introduction of the new products so that the impact on Service Consumers A, B, and C is minimized?

AThe Service Abstraction principle can be applied to hide the implementation details from the core service logic of Service A, thereby shielding this logic from changes to the implementation. In support of this, the Service Facade pattern can be applied to position Facade components between the core service logic and Service Consumers A and B . These Facade components will be designed to regulate the behavior of Service A . The Contract Centralization pattern can be applied to force Service Consumer C to access Service A via one of its existing service contracts.

BA third service contract can be added together with the application of the Contract Centralization pattern. This will force Service Consumer C to access Service A via the new service contract. The Service Facade pattern can be applied to position a Facade component between the new service contract and Service Consumer C in order to regulate the behavior of Service A . The Service Abstraction principle can be applied to hide the implementation details of Service A so that no future service consumers are designed to access any of Service A's underlying resources directly.

CThe Service Facade pattern can be applied to position Facade components between the core service logic and the two service contracts. These Facade components will be designed to regulate the behavior of Service A . The Contract Centralization pattern can also be applied to force Service Consumer C to access Service A via one of its existing service contracts.

DNone of the above.

Answer : C

Question 4

Service A . Service B . and Service C are each designed to access the same shared legacy system. The service contracts for Service A, Service B, and Service C are standardized and decoupled from the underlying service logic. Service A and Service B are agnostic services that are frequently reused by different service compositions. Service C is a non-agnostic task service that requires access to the legacy system in order to retrieve business rules required for the service to make runtime decisions that determine its service composition logic. The legacy system uses a proprietary file format that Services A, B, and C need to convert to and from. Service A is an agnostic utility service that is used by other services to gain access to the legacy system. Services B and C were not designed to access the legacy system via Service A because the Service A service contract was derived from the legacy system API and is therefore not standardized and exhibits negative contract-to-implementation coupling. You are told that additional services need to be created, all of which need access to the legacy system. You are also told that the legacy system may be replaced in the near future. What steps can be taken to ensure that the replacement of the legacy system has a minimal impact on Services B and C and any future services that are designed to rely upon it?

AThe Service Abstraction, Service Reusability, and Service Autonomy principles need to be applied in order to support the application of the Official Endpoint pattern to Service A . This would position Service A as the official utility service through which the legacy system can be accessed. Service B will need to be redesigned to access Service A instead of accessing the legacy system directly. Due to the dependency on business rules embedded within the legacy system the option of applying the Rules Centralization pattern is not available. Service C will therefore need to continue accessing the legacy system directly.

BThe Standardized Service Contract and Service Loose Coupling principles can be applied in order to establish a standardized service contract for Service A that will eliminate its negative contract coupling. Service B will need to be redesigned to access Service A instead of accessing the legacy system directly. Due to the dependency on business rules embedded within the legacy system the option of applying the Rules Centralization pattern is not available. Service C will therefore need to continue accessing the legacy system directly.

CThe Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied together with the Standardized Service Contract principle in order to establish a standardized service contract for Service A that will eliminate its negative contract coupling. The Official Endpoint pattern can then be applied to position Service A as the official utility service through which the legacy system can be accessed. Services B and C will need to be redesigned to access Service A instead of accessing the legacy system directly.

DNone of the above.

Answer : C

Question 5

Service A is a task service that is required to carry out a series of updates to a set of databases in order to complete a task. To perform the database updates Service A must interact with three other services, each of which provides standardized data access capabilities. Service A sends its first update request message to Service B (1), which then responds with a message containing a success or failure code (2). Service A then sends its second update request message to Service C (3), which also responds with a message containing a success or failure code (4). Finally, Service A sends a request message to Service D (5), which responds with its own message containing a success or failure code (6).

You've been asked to change this service composition architecture in order to fulfill a set of new requirements: First, if the database update performed by Service B fails, then it must be logged by Service A . Secondly, if the database update performed by Service C fails, then a notification email must be sent out to a human administrator. Third, if the database update performed by either Service C or Service D fails, then both of these updates must be reversed so that the respective databases are restored back to their original states. What steps can be taken to fulfill these requirements?

AService A is updated to perform a logging routine when Service A receives a response message from Service B containing a failure code. Service A is further updated to send an e-mail notification to a human administrator if Service A receives a response message from Service C containing a failure code. The Atomic Service Transaction pattern is applied so that Services A, C, and D are encompassed in the scope of a transaction that will guarantee that if the database updates performed by either Service C or Service D fails, then both updates will be rolled back.

BThe Compensating Service Transaction pattern is applied to Service B so that it invokes exception handling logic that logs failed database updates before responding with a failure code back to Service A . Similarly, the Compensating Service Transaction pattern is applied to Service C so that it issues an e-mail notification to a human administrator when a database update fails. The Atomic Service Transaction pattern is applied so that Services A, C, and D are encompassed in the scope of a transaction that will guarantee that if the database updates performed by either Service C or Service D fails, then both updates will be rolled back. The Service Autonomy principle is further applied to Service A to ensure that it remains consistently available to carry out this sequence of actions.

CThe Atomic Service Transaction pattern is applied so that Services A, C, and D are encompassed in the scope of a transaction that will guarantee that if the database updates performed by either Service C or Service D fails, then both updates will be rolled back. The Compensating Service Transaction pattern is then applied to all services so that the scope of the compensating transaction includes the scope of the atomic transaction. The compensating exception logic that is added to Service D automatically invokes Service B to log the failure condition and Service C to issue the e-mail notification to the human administrator. This way, it is guaranteed that the compensating logic is always executed together with the atomic transaction logic.

DNone of the above.

Answer : A

Question 6

When Service A receives a message from Service Consumer A(1),the message is processed by Component A . This component first invokes Component B (2), which uses values from the message to query Database A in order to retrieve additional data. Component B then returns the additional data to Component A . Component A then invokes Component C (3), which interacts with the API of a legacy system to retrieve a new data value. Component C then returns the data value back to Component A . Next, Component A sends some of the data it has accumulated to Component D (4), which writes the data to a te>X file that is placed in a specific folder. Component D then waits until this file is imported into a different system via a regularly scheduled batch import. Upon completion of the import, Component D returns a success or failure code back to Component A . Component A finally sends a response to Service Consumer A (5) containing all of the data collected so far and Service Consumer A writes all of the data to Database B (6). Components A, B, C . and D belong to the Service A service architecture. Database A, the legacy system, and the file folders are shared resources within the IT enterprise.

Service A is an entity service with a service architecture that has grown over the past few years. As a result of a service inventory-wide redesign project, you are asked to revisit the Service A service architecture in order to separate the logic provided by Components B, C, and D into three different utility services without disrupting the behavior of Service A as it relates to Service Consumer A . What steps can be taken to fulfill these requirements?

AThe Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied so that Component B is separated into a separate wrapper utility service that wraps the shared database. The Asynchronous Queuing pattern can be applied so that a messaging queue is positioned between Component A and Component C, thereby enabling communication during times when the legacy system may be unavailable or heavily accessed by other parts of the IT enterprise. The Service Facade pattern can be applied so that a Facade component is added between Component A and Component D so that any change in behavior can be compensated. The Service Autonomy principle can be further applied to Service A to help make up for any performance loss that may result from splitting the component into a separate wrapper utility service.

BThe Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied so that Component B is separated into a separate utility service that wraps the shared database. The Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied again so that Component C is separated into a separate utility service that acts as a wrapper for the legacy system API. The Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied once more to Component D so that it is separated into another utility service that provides standardized access to the file folder. The Service Facade pattern can be applied so that three Faade components are added: one between Component A and each of the new wrapper utility services. This way, the Faade components can compensate for any change in behavior that may occur as a result of the separation. The Service Compos ability principle can be further applied to Service A and the three new wrapper utility services so that all four services are optimized for participation in the new service composition. This will help make up for any performance loss that may result from splitting the three components into separate services.

CThe Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied so that Component B is separated into a separate utility service that wraps the shared database. The Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied again so that Component C is separated into a separate utility service that acts as a wrapper for the legacy system API. Component D is separated into a separate service and the Event-Driven Messaging pattern is applied to establish a publisher-subscriber relationship between this new service and Component A . The interaction between Service Consumer A and Component A is then redesigned so that Component A first interacts with Component B and the new wrapper service. Service A then issues a final message back to Service Consumer A . The Service Compos ability principle can be further applied to Service A and the three new wrapper utility services so that all four services are optimized for participation in the new service composition. This will help make up for any performance loss that may result from splitting the three components into separate services.

DNone of the above.

Answer : B

Question 7

Service Consumer A sends a message with a business document to Service A (1), which writes the business document to Database A (2). Service A then forwards the business document to Service B (3), which writes the business document to Database B (4). Service B then responds to Service A with a message containing a failure or success code (5) after which Service A responds to Service Consumer A with a message containing a failure or success code (6). Upon receiving the message, Service Consumer A updates a log table in Database B (7). The log entry is comprised of the entire business document. Database A is dedicated to the Service A service architecture and Database B is a shared database.

There are two problems with this service composition architecture that you are asked to address: First, both Service Consumer A and Service B need to transform the business document data from an XML format to a proprietary Comma Separated Value (CSV) in order to write the data to Database B . This has led to redundant data format transformation logic that has been difficult to keep in synch when Database B changes. Secondly, Service A is an entity service that is being reused by several other service compositions. It has lately developed reliability problems that have caused the service to become unavailable for extended periods. What steps can be taken to solve these problems?

AThe Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied so that data access to Database B is separated into a new wrapper utility service. This way, the Data Format Transformation pattern only needs to be applied within the logic of this new service which will expose a standardized contract that both Service Consumer A and Service B can access. The Asynchronous Queuing pattern can be applied so that messaging queues are established between Service Consumer A and Service A and between Service A and Service B . The Service Autonomy principle can be further applied to Service A in order to establish a more isolated and reliable surrounding infrastructure.

BThe Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied so that data access to Database B is separated into a new wrapper utility service. This way, the Data Format Transformation pattern only needs to be applied within the logic of this new service which will expose a standardized contract that both Service Consumer A and Service B can access. The Reliable Messaging pattern can be applied so that acknowledgements are passed between Service Consumer A and Service A and between Service A and Service B . The Service Compos ability principle can be further applied to Service A in order to optimize its service architecture for improved participation in multiple service compositions.

CThe service composition can be redesigned with the application of the Contract Centralization pattern so that instead of writing the business document to Database B, Service Consumer A sends the business document to Service B instead. This way, Service B would provide the only location where data format transformation logic for Database B needs to be carried out, which further supports the application of the Service Reusability principle. The Reliable Messaging pattern can be applied so that acknowledgements are passed between Service Consumer A and Service A and between Service A and Service B . The Service Compos ability principle can be further applied to Service A in order to optimize its service architecture for improved participation in multiple service compositions.

DNone of the above.

Answer : A