Arcitura Education SOA Security Lab S90.20 Exam Questions

Page: 1 / 14
Total 30 questions

Want more questions? Get Premium Access.
()

Question 1

Services A, B, and C reside in Service Inventory A and Services D, E, and F reside in Service Inventory B .Service B is an authentication broker that issues WS-Trust based SAML tokens to Services A and C upon receiving security credentials from Services A and C .Service E is an authentication broker that issues WS-Trust based SAML tokens to Services D and F upon receiving security credentials from Services D and E .Service B uses the Service Inventory A identify store to validate the security credentials of Services A and C .Service E uses the Service Inventory B identity store to validate the security credentials of Services D and F .It is decided to use Service E as the sole authentication broker for all services in Service Inventories A and B .Service B is kept as a secondary authentication broker for load balancing purposes. Specifically, it is to be used for situations where authentication requests are expected to be extra time consuming in order to limit the performance burden on Service E .Even though Service B has all the necessary functionality to fulfill this new responsibility, only Service E can issue SAML tokens to other services. How can these architectures be modified to support these new requirements?

AWhen time consuming authentication requests are identified, Service E can forward them to Service B .Upon performing the authentication, Service B sends its own signed SAML token to Service E .Because Service E trusts Service B .it can use the Service B-specific SAML token to issue an official SAML token that is then sent to the original service consumer (that requested authentication) and further used by other services.

BTo provide load balancing, a service agent needs to be implemented to intercept all incoming requests to Service E .The-service agent uses a random distribution of the authentication requests between Service B and Service E .Because the request messages are distributed in a random manner, the load between the two authentication brokers is balanced.

CBecause both Service B and Service E issue SAML tokens, these tokens are interchangeable. In order for both services to-receive the same amount of authentication requests, a shared key needs to be provided to them for signing the SAML tokens. By signing the SAML tokens with the same key, the SAML tokens generated by Service B cannot be distinguished from the SAML tokens generated by Service E .

DBecause the federation requirements ask for SAML tokens generated by Service E, Service B cannot function as an-authentication broker. To address the load balancing requirement, a new utility service needs to be introduced to provide functionality that is redundant with Service E .This essentially establishes a secondary authentication broker to which Service E can defer time-consuming authentication tasks at runtime.

Answer : B

Question 2

Services A, B, and C reside in Service Inventory A and Services D, E, and F reside in Service Inventory B .Service B is an authentication broker that issues WS-Trust based SAML tokens to Services A and C upon receiving security credentials from Services A and C .Service E is an authentication broker that issues WS-Trust based SAML tokens to Services D and F upon receiving security credentials from Services D and E .Service B uses the Service Inventory A identify store to validate the security credentials of Services A and C .Service E uses the Service Inventory B identity store to validate the security credentials of Services D and F .To date, the two service inventories have existed independently from each other. However, a requirement has emerged that the services in Service Inventory A need to be able to use the services in Service Inventory B, and vice versa. How can cross-service inventory message exchanges be enabled with minimal changes to the existing service inventory architectures and without introducing new security mechanisms?

ABecause SAML tokens cannot be used across multiple security domains, authentication brokers C and E need to be replaced with one single authentication broker so that one token issuer is used for all services across both of the service inventories.

BThe current security mechanism already fulfills the requirement because SAML tokens can be used across multiple security-domains. The only change required is for each authentication broker to be configured so that it issues service inventory-specific assertions for SAML tokens originating from other service inventories.

CThe individual domain service inventories need to be combined into one enterprise service inventory. The Service Perimeter Guard pattern can be applied to establish a contact point for request messages originating from outside the service inventory. Within the service inventory, services no longer need to be authenticated because they are all part of the same trust boundary.

DThe Trusted Subsystem pattern is applied to encapsulate Services B and E using a central utility service that balances request and response messages exchanged between Services B and E, depending on which service inventory the messages originate from. The utility service also contains transformation logic to ensure that the SAML tokens issued by Services B and E are compatible. This guarantees that an issued SAML token can be used across Service Inventories A and B without further need for runtime conversion.

Answer : B

Question 3

Service A is a publically accessible service that provides free multimedia retrieval capabilities to a range of service consumers. To carry out this functionality, Service A is first invoked by Service Consumer A (1). Based on the nature of the request message received from Service Consumer A, Service A either invokes Service B or Service C .When Service B is invoked by Service A (2A) it retrieves data from publicly available sources (not shown) and responds with the requested data (3A). When Service C is invoked by Service A (2B) it retrieves data from proprietary sources within the IT enterprise (not shown) and responds with the requested data (3B). After receiving a response from Service B or Service C, Service A sends the retrieved data to Service Consumer A (4). Service B does not require service consumers to be authenticated, but Service C does require authentication of service consumers. The service contract for Service A therefore uses WS-Policy alternative policies in order to express the two different authentication requirements to Service Consumer A .When Service Consumer A sends a request message (1), Service A determines whether the request requires the involvement of Service C and then checks to ensure that the necessary security credentials were received as part of the message. If the credentials provided by Service Consumer A are verified. Service A creates a signed SAML assertion and sends it with the request message to Service C (2B) This authentication information is protected by public key encryption However, responses to Service Consumer A's request message (3B, 4) are not encrypted for performance reasons. The owner of Service C is planning two changes to the service architecture:

1. A fee will be charged to Service Consumer A (or any service consumer) using Service C .2. The response messages issued by Service C need to be secured in order to prevent unauthorized access. An analysis of Service C's usage statistics reveals that a group of service consumers specifically request the retrieval of multimedia data on a frequent basis. To promote the usage of Service C to these types of service consumers, the owner of Service C plans to offer a special discount by allowing unlimited multimedia retrievals for a fixed monthly price. Service consumers that do not subscribe to this promotion will need to pay for each request individually. It is anticipated that the new promotion will significantly increase the usage of Service C .The owner of Service C therefore wants to ensure that the security added to the response messages has a minimal impact on Service C's runtime performance. What steps can be taken to fulfill these requirements?

AUse symmetric session keys so that for each response message, Service C generates a session key and encrypts the-response message using this session key. The session key is then encrypted (using the service consumer's public key) and attached to the encrypted response. A single session key can then be used by Service C for communication with all service consumers that subscribe to the promotion.

BBecause the services in this service composition already rely on public key encryption to provide authentication, Service C can provide message confidentiality by encrypting the response message with Service Consumer A's public key. This will ensure that only the intended recipient, in possession of the corresponding private key, can decrypt the response message. To further reduce the performance impact of encryption, Service C can generate a new public-private key pair to be used by service consumers subscribed to the promotion. By securely distributing the private key to each of these service consumers, Service C only needs to encrypt the response messages once with the public key.

CDesign Service C to generate a message digest of the response message and encrypt it with the service consumer's publickey. Because the message digest is typically small, the performance of public key encryption is acceptable. This approach also ensures that only the service consumer can decrypt the response message using the corresponding private key.

DDesign the service composition architecture so that the encryption of the response messages is performed by Service B and Service C .To reduce the performance impact, a policy can be added to Service A's service contract in order to require the encryption of all response messages, regardless of the type of service consumer making the request. Further, a new utility service can be added to the service composition. This service can be responsible for obtaining the public key of the service consumer and forwarding the key along with the request message to the appropriate service (Service B or Service C). The service receiving the message can then encrypt the response message with the received public key. Service A can then forward the encrypted response to the service consumer. This approach ensures that only authorized service consumers will be able to access response messages.

Answer : A

Question 4

Service A provides a customized report generating capability. Due to infrastructure limitations, the number of service consumers permitted to access Service A concurrently is strictly controlled. Service A validates request messages based on the supplied credentials (1). If the authentication of the request message is successful, Service A sends a message to Service B (2) to retrieve the required data from Database A (3). Service A stores the response from Service B (4) in memory and then issues a request message to Service C (5). Service C retrieves a different set of data from Database A (6) and sends the result back to Service A (7). Service A consolidates the data received from Services B and C and sends the generated report in the response message to its service consumer (8).

This service composition was recently shut down after it was discovered that Database A had been successfully attacked twice in a row. The first type of attack consisted of a series of coordinated request messages sent by the same malicious service consumer, with the intention of triggering a range of exception conditions within the database in order to generate various error messages. The second type of attack consisted of a service consumer sending request messages with malicious input with the intention of gaining control over the database server. This attack resulted in the deletion of database records and tables. An investigation revealed that both attacks were carried out by malicious service consumers that were authorized. How can the service composition security architecture be improved to prevent these types of attacks?

AApply the Data Confidentiality pattern together with the Data Origin Authentication pattern. This establishes message-level-security so that all messages are encrypted and digitally signed. Secondly, the Service A logic must be enhanced so that it can keep track of the trustworthiness of its service consumers If a request message originated from a trustworthy service consumer, then the request message is processed as normal. If the request message originates from a non-trustworthy service consumer, then the request message is rejected and an error message is returned to the service consumer.

BApply the Service Perimeter Guard pattern together with the Trusted Subsystem pattern. This establishes a perimeter service between Database A and any service that requires access to it (including Services B and C). The perimeter service evaluates incoming data requests and filters out those that can introduce a security risk. Only request messages issued by authorized services and service consumers are forwarded to Database A .Responses originating from Database A are further evaluated by the trusted subsystem to remove any unauthorized data. The two patterns together ensure that only authorized data is returned to the service consumer and that no request messages present a security threat to Database A.

CApply the Exception Shielding pattern together with the Message Screening pattern. This establishes new logic within Service A that screens incoming request messages for data-driven attacks (such as SQL injection and X-Path injection attacks), and also evaluates whether exception details returned by Database A contains potentially confidential or unsafe information. Any inappropriate exception information is replaced with sanitized content.

DApply the Trusted Subsystem pattern to protect Database A from data-driven attacks and to evaluate whether database-responses contain inappropriate data. The trusted subsystem maintains a snapshot of Database A and executes the original service consumer's request message against the snapshot. The processing logic that accesses the snapshot has limited privileges in order to prevent malicious attacks from overtaking the database. If no security violation is detected during the processing of the snapshot, then the original service consumer's request is forwarded to Database A .If an error message is generated during the processing of the snapshot, then it is returned to the original service consumer and the request is not forwarded to Database A .Because the error message was generated on the snapshot, it cannot contain unsafe information about Database A.

Answer : C

Question 5

Services A, B and C belong to Service Inventory A .Services D, E and F belong to Service Inventory B .Service C acts as an authentication broker for Service Inventory A .Service F acts as an authentication broker for Service Inventory B .Both of the authentication brokers use Kerberos-based authentication technologies. Upon receiving a request message from a service consumer, Services C and F authenticate the request using a local identity store and then use a separate Ticket Granting Service (not shown) to issue the Kerberos ticket to the service consumer. Currently, tickets issued in one service inventory are not valid in the other. For example, if Service A wants to communicate with Services D or E, it must request a ticket from the Service Inventory B authentication broker (Service F). Because Service Inventory A and B trust each other, the current cross-inventory authentication is considered unnecessarily redundant. How can these service inventory architectures be improved to avoid redundant authentication?

ACreate a single, enterprise-wide service inventory by merging Service Inventories A and B .Instead of the current Kerberos-based brokered authentication, the merged service inventory can use X.509 digital certificates to remove the burden from the local authentication brokers. Designate either Service C or Service F as the central authentication service with the responsibility to validate service consumer X.509 digital certificates. After successful validation, the authentication service can issue a signed SAML token to be used within the entire service inventory.

BThe same Kerberos tickets can be used across both service inventories by updating the security policies of the services that require Kerberos tickets. Because each authentication broker issues Kerberos tickets, the only difference between these tickets is the identity of the issuer. For-example, because services in Service Inventory A already accept Kerberos tickets issued by Service C, Service F just needs to be included in the security policies of these services. Similarly, services in Service Inventory B that accept Kerberos tickets issued by Service F need to include the acceptance of Kerberos tickets issued by Service C in their security policies.

CA trust relationship needs to be established between the two authentication brokers. This trust relationship can enable the authentication brokers to accept Kerberos tickets issued by each other.

DReplace Services C and F with a single authentication broker so that one single token can be used with services across both service inventories. This can be achieved by merging the content of the two identity stores.

Answer : C

Question 6

Services A, B and C belong to Service Inventory A .Services D, E and F belong to Service Inventory B .Service C acts as an authentication broker for Service Inventory A .Service F acts as an authentication broker for Service Inventory B .Both of the authentication brokers use Kerberos-based authentication technologies. Upon receiving a request message from a service consumer, Services C and F authenticate the request using a local identity store and then use a separate Ticket Granting Service (not shown) to issue the Kerberos ticket to the service consumer. A recent security audit of the two service inventories revealed that both authentication brokers have been victims of attacks. In Service Inventory A, the attacker has been intercepting and modifying the credential information sent by Service C (the ticket requester) to the Ticket Granting Service. As a result, the requests have been invalidated and incorrectly rejected by the Ticket Granting Service. In Service Inventory B, the attacker has been obtaining service consumer credentials and has used them to request and receive valid tickets from the Ticket Granting Service. The attacker has then used these tickets to enable malicious service consumers to gain access to other services within the service inventory. How can the two service inventory security architectures be improved in order to counter these attacks?

AThe Data Confidentiality pattern can be applied to messages exchanged by the services in Service Inventory A .The Data Origin Authentication pattern can be applied to messages exchanged by services in Service Inventory B .

BThe Service Perimeter Guard pattern can be applied to Service Inventory A in order to establish a perimeter service responsible for validating and filtering all incoming request messages on behalf of Service C .The Data Origin Authentication pattern can be applied to messages exchanged by services in Service Inventory B .This will ensure the integrity of messages by verifying their origins to the message recipients.

CWS-Secure-Conversation can be used to secure the communication between the authentication broker and service consumers in Service Inventory A .This ensures that Services A and B will contact Service C to request a security context token that will be used to generates a session key for the encryption of the ticket submitted to Service C . The Data Origin Authentication pattern can be applied to messages exchanged by services in Service Inventory B .This will ensure the integrity of messages try verifying their origins to the message recipients.

DWS-Trust can be used to establish secure communication between the authentication broker and the service consumers. After receiving the request message and the corresponding credentials from service consumers, the authentication broker can validate their identity, and if successful, a signed SAML assertion containing all authentication information will be issued. The SAML assertion will then be used to authenticate the service consumers during subsequent communications. Because the messages are signed and encrypted, malicious service consumers cannot access the data. This approach can be applied to counter the threats in both Service Inventories A and B .

Answer : A

Question 7

AApply the Service Perimeter Guard pattern in order to protect message exchanges between Service A and its service-consumers. Apply the Direct Authentication pattern in order to protect message exchanges between Service A and Service B .

BApply the Direct Authentication pattern in order to protect message exchanges between Service A and its service consumers and between Service A and Service B .This approach will establish a password-based authentication mechanism that relies on a local identity store and will therefore prevent access by attackers.

CApply the Data Origin Authentication pattern to protect the final report sent by Service A to its service consumer. Service A can generate a message digest of the final report, after which it can sign the digest with its own private key. It then can send both the final report and the signed-message digest to its service consumer. This service consumer can generate its own message digest, decrypt the signed digest using the public key of Service A (which proves that Service A sent the message), and then compare the two digests. If the digests match, it guarantees that the final report was not tampered with during transmission.

DNone of the above

Answer : D