Broadcom Endpoint Security Complete Implementation - Technical Specialist 250-586 Exam Practice Test

Answer : B

In Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), the Endpoint search feature is used to search for real-time indicators of compromise (IoCs) across managed devices. This feature allows security teams to investigate suspicious activities by querying endpoints directly for evidence of threats, helping to detect and respond to potential compromises swiftly.

SES Complete Documentation describes Endpoint search as a crucial tool for threat hunting within EDR, enabling real-time investigation and response to security incidents.

Answer : C

Adaptive Protection is designed to reduce the attack surface by managing suspicious behaviors performed by trusted applications. This feature provides dynamic, behavior-based protection that allows trusted applications to operate normally while monitoring and controlling any suspicious actions they might perform.

Purpose of Adaptive Protection: It monitors and restricts potentially harmful behaviors in applications that are generally trusted, thus reducing the risk of misuse or exploitation.

Attack Surface Reduction: By focusing on behavior rather than solely on known malicious files, Adaptive Protection effectively minimizes the risk of attacks that exploit legitimate applications.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (Malware Prevention Configuration) targets malware but does not specifically control trusted applications' behaviors.

Option B (Host Integrity Configuration) focuses on policy compliance rather than behavioral monitoring.

Option D (Network Integrity Configuration) deals with network-level threats, not application behaviors.

Therefore, Adaptive Protection is the feature best suited to reduce the attack surface by managing suspicious behaviors in trusted applications.

Answer : D

The Executive Summary section of the SES Complete Solution Design provides a summary of the features and functions to be implemented. This summary is tailored for stakeholders and decision-makers, offering a high-level overview of the solution's capabilities, key features, and intended outcomes without going into technical specifics. It helps to convey the value and strategic benefits of the SES Complete solution to the organization.

SES Complete Implementation Documentation highlights the Executive Summary as a crucial section for communicating the solution's scope and anticipated impact to executives and non-technical stakeholders.

Answer : A

The first phase of the SES Complete Implementation Framework is the Assess phase. This phase involves gathering information about the customer's environment, identifying business and technical requirements, and understanding the customer's security objectives.

Purpose of the Assess Phase: The goal is to fully understand the customer's needs, which guides the entire implementation process.

Foundation for Solution Design: This phase provides essential insights that shape the subsequent design and implementation stages, ensuring that the solution aligns with the customer's requirements.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (Design) follows the Assess phase, where the gathered information is used to develop the solution.

Option C (Operate) and Option D (Transform) are later phases focusing on managing and evolving the solution post-deployment.

Thus, the Assess phase is the correct starting point in the SES Complete Implementation Framework.

Answer : C

SES Complete offers customers hybrid, cloud-based, and on-premises deployment options. This flexibility allows organizations to choose the deployment model that best aligns with their infrastructure, security policies, and operational needs. Hybrid deployment enables organizations to leverage both on-premises and cloud resources, while a fully cloud-based or solely on-premises model may be preferred based on specific requirements or regulatory considerations.

Symantec Endpoint Security Documentation details the deployment options to provide adaptability for diverse customer environments, enabling optimized security solutions regardless of the infrastructure.

Answer : D

For an organization with remote locations and minimal bandwidth that wants a content distribution solution without configuring an internal LiveUpdate server, using a Group Update Provider (GUP) is the best choice.

Efficient Content Distribution: The GUP serves as a local distribution point within each remote location, reducing the need for each client to connect directly to the central management server for updates. This minimizes WAN bandwidth usage.

No Need for Internal LiveUpdate Server: The GUP can pull updates from the central SEP Manager and then distribute them to local clients, eliminating the need for a dedicated internal LiveUpdate server and optimizing bandwidth usage in remote locations.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (External LiveUpdate) would involve each client connecting to Symantec's servers, which could strain bandwidth.

Option B (Management Server) directly distributing updates is less efficient for remote locations with limited bandwidth.

Option C (Intelligent Updater) is typically used for manual updates and is not practical for ongoing, automated content distribution.

Thus, the Group Update Provider is the optimal solution for remote locations with limited bandwidth that do not want to set up an internal LiveUpdate server.

Answer : B

In the Assess phase, the gathered business and technical objectives should be documented as they provide the foundation for assessing the solution's effectiveness and alignment with organizational goals.

Documenting Objectives: Proper documentation ensures that the objectives are clearly understood and preserved for reference throughout the implementation process, aligning all stakeholders on the expected outcomes.

Proceeding with the Assessment: Once documented, these objectives guide the evaluation of the solution's performance, identifying any areas that may require adjustments to meet the organization's needs.

Ensuring Traceability: Documented objectives offer traceability, allowing each stage of the implementation to reference back to these goals for consistent alignment.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (ranking them) is useful but does not substitute the documentation and assessment process.

Option C (discussing only with IT staff) limits stakeholder involvement.

Option D (creating separate reports) is redundant and not typically required at this stage.

The correct approach is to document the objectives and proceed with the assessment of the solution's alignment with these goals.