CIPS L4M3 Commercial Contracting Exam Practice Test

Answer : C

Express terms are the terms of the agreement which are expressly agreed between the parties. Ideally, they will be written down in a contract between the parties but where the contract is agreed verbally, they will be the terms discussed and agreed between the parties.

The types of express terms to be found in a contract are many and varied and will depend on the type of contract. Any term written into the contract is an express term and may refer to price, time scales, warranties and indemnities, limitations on liability, conditions precedent and so on.

- Contracts: Express and Implied Terms

- CIPS study guide page 32

LO 1, AC 1.2

Answer : C

Performance management framework often consists of KPIs, targets and consequences that arise from achieved scores. To ensure that the framework has binding effect on contracting parties, it should be developed, appended to the main contract document and agreed by both parties. So the answer should be 'Yes, because the framework should have legal standing as a part of contract'.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Answer : A, D

Request for quotations is often used when the only variable is price and the purchase value is under a financial threshold. This process is less formal than ITT. RFQ should be used in the following circumstances:

- Low-value, low-risk purchases

- When the specifications are sufficiently defined or the product/service is standardised

- Where the suppliers are pre-qualified

- Where there is a framework agreement which specifies the contract terms and conditions.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Answer : B, D

A framework agreement is an agreement with one or more suppliers/providers which sets out terms and conditions under which individual contracts (call-offs) can be made throughout the term of the agreement.

A framework agreement itself is not a contract, but the call-offs made from it are.

Framework arrangements create a streamlined and flexible process for procuring goods, works or services

Where a framework for the same goods, works or services is awarded to several suppliers, there are three possible options for awarding call-off contracts: direct award (or direct call-off), mini-competition or a combination of both.

Option 1 -- Apply the terms of the framework agreement (direct award).

Where your requirements match the terms and/or specification of the framework agreement (in the event of any query, you should clarify the situation with the organisation that established the framework), a particular call-off should be awarded without re-opening competition. The call-off should be awarded to the provider who is identified as the most economically advantageous tender based on the award criteria used at the time that the framework was established (i.e. the supplier ranked no. 1). Randomly selecting a supplier off a framework is not permitted.

Option 2 -- Hold a mini-competition between capable suppliers.

If your requirements do not match the terms and/or the specification of the framework, you should conduct a mini-competition exercise. Whilst it is not permitted to substantially change the basic terms or specification of the framework, in running a mini-competition it is possible to supplement or refine the basic terms of the framework prior to making a call-off. Examples of such terms are:

- The particular goods/services/works required;

- Particular delivery timescales;

- Particular invoicing arrangements and payment profiles;

- Associated services such as installation, maintenance and training;

- Quantity;

- Functional specification.

Under no circumstances should brand names or brand-specific descriptions of goods be used e.g. BIC Biro Pen, Hewlett-Packard Printer, Dell computer. Descriptions should give reference to the characteristics and outputs of the product or service. Where no other description is possible, any reference should be qualified by adding the words 'or equivalent'.

When a mini-competition exercise is held, all suppliers appointed to the framework that are capable of meeting the requirement must be invited to submit a tender. (This might just relate to suppliers within a particular 'lot'). You must not limit the mini-competition exercise to selected providers. A time limit for submitting the tender must be set and advised to competing suppliers. This time limit must be reasonable, taking account of the complexity of the requirement.

The call-off must be awarded on the basis of the framework award criteria and new criteria cannot be added, although, where permitted, the weightings may be varied to take account of a particular requirement. However, in adjusting the weightings, care must be taken to ensure that any such changes do not have an adverse effect on competition.

Option 3 - Combination of direct award and mini-competition

To use a combination approach, the procurement documents must state that this route may be used. The procurement documents will also specify which terms may be subject to the re-opening of competition.

- Guidance on the Use of Framework Agreements

- CIPS study guide page 60-62

LO 1, AC 1.3

Answer : A

A revocation of offer is the withdrawal of a previous offer to engage in some sort of legally binding contract. The previous offer had to have been such that it would have immediately become legally binding if the other party had formally agreed to it.

A core ruling defining revocation of offers was established by Payne v. Cave. This case established that neither party is bound to an agreement until an offer has been made by one and formally accepted by the other.

If an offer has been made, the offering party has a right to withdraw it up to formal acceptance by the offeree. Revocation basically serves as formal, legally verifiable notice that a withdrawal was made, and it's valid so long as it is communicated to the offeree before they accept.

The case of Byrne v. Van Tienhoven supports this by establishing that the withdrawal of an offer by telegram is only valid if the telegram is received before the offer is accepted. The case of Dickinson v. Dodds further establishes that the party making the offer can communicate the revocation through a third party.

- What Is a Revocation of Offer?

- CIPS study guide page 31

LO 1, AC 1.2

Answer : D, E

The key features, advantages and disadvantages of standard terms are summarised below:

- Form: Concise, generic and designed to be attached to purchase or sales orders

- Non-negotiable

- Ineffective terms: may be replaced by implied terms or national legal code rules, or subject to court 'balance of interest' judgement.

- Advantages: Basic contractual protection for most common circumstances; Avoid having to create new contract for repeat business.

- User friendly

- Usage: Low value, low risk, repetitive transactions

- Coverage: Definitions, relationship to other contracts, formation of the contract, order of precedence, price, invoicing and payment, specification, legal compliance, warrantee and liability, ownership and risk, intellectual property, data management and ethics.

- Disadvantages: Does not allow for specific circumstances; Risk for creating battle of the forms; Can create contractual uncertainty if used with purchase orders under call-off contracts.

LO 3, AC 3.1

Answer : C

Penetration pricing is a marketing strategy used by businesses to attract customers to a new product or service by offering a lower price during its initial offering. The lower price helps a new product or service penetrate the market and attract customers away from competitors.

Price skimming is a product pricing strategy by which a firm charges the highest initial price that customers will pay and then lowers it over time. As the demand of the first customers is satisfied and competition enters the market, the firm lowers the price to attract another, more price-sensitive segment of the population. The skimming strategy gets its name from 'skimming' successive layers of cream, or customer segments, as prices are lowered over time.

Incentive contracts allow sharing of the risks between the contractor and the client. The contractor is reimbursed all its justifiable costs in addition to a calculated fee. Target costing is an element of incentive contracts.

Cost-plus pricing is also known as markup pricing. It's a pricing method where a fixed percentage is added on top of the cost to produce

LO 3, AC 3.3