Alan has an ongoing contract with a supplier for the provision of gardening tools to his horti-culture business. He has been working with the supplier for over 20 years and has recently discovered that the supplier committed a breach in a warranty 3 years ago. Can Alan claim damages?
Answer : A
'Yes- A Breach has occurred and a contract is in place' - this is the correct answer. Claims against warranties can be made up to six years from the date the contract is breached. Option 2 isn't correct as a breach in warranty does not allow you to rescind the contract. Options 3 and 4 are incorrect because Alan CAN claim damages. There's a useful table about warranties and conditions on p. 127
Which of the following conflict resolution styles may involve a private caucus and a joint ses-sion?
Answer : A
This is Mediation. The private caucus is when each of the parties meets in private with the media-tor, this is usually after a joint session between the three parties. See p.71 for more information on mediation
A failure to perform a provision of a contract which does not affect the end performance of the contract is known as what?
Answer : B
This is a minor breach. This is the definition as given in the study guide on p. 48
Dianne has a loan agreement which contains a clause for default. What does a clause for default imply?
Answer : D
A Clause for Default 'allows the lender to demand full payment of the outstanding balance'. See p.102. And always read the small print before you sign a loan agreement :)
Penguin Ltd has a contract with Blue Company. Blue Company has just broken a warranty in the contract. What remedies does Penguin Ltd have available?
Answer : D
They can claim damages but not terminate the contract. If Blue company has broken a Condition, they would be able to terminate the contract, but this isn't the case for a breach of a Warranty. See p.43 for more details
Perry is seeking a resolution to a conflict he has with his supplier. He wants a third party to make a binding and legally enforceable decision and wants the issue to remain confidential. He is considering litigation. Is this the best solution for Perry?
Answer : C
Perry should try adjudication. Litigation is public so there would be no confidentiality. Out of the four options only adjudication would provide Perry with what he needs; a binding decision which is confidential. See p.146 for more information on litigation.
Which of the following will you put into box 8?
Answer : C
The correct answers are as follows:

This is a condition. Again the food being organic would be fundamental to the contract as the health of the llamas depend on it.
This is arbitration as it involves a panel.
This is an innominate term as it won't be mentioned in the contract. It won't be until a breach occurs when it is decided whether the issue of subcontracting is a condition or a warranty, and which one it will be, will likely depend on the situation. For example if they subcontract out to a non-organic llama food provider, that would probably be a Condition. If they get help fulfilling an order and the subcontractor is also organic, that's probably a warranty.