CrowdStrike Certified Identity Specialist IDP Exam Questions

Page: 1 / 14
Total 58 questions
Question 1

Under which CrowdStrike documentation category could you find Identity Protection API information?



Answer : D

Identity Protection API documentation is part of CrowdStrike's centralized API documentation structure. According to the CCIS curriculum, Identity Protection API information is located under the ''CrowdStrike APIs'' documentation category.

This category includes:

API authentication and scopes

Identity Protection GraphQL schemas

Query examples for detections, incidents, users, and risk

Usage guidance and limitations

CrowdStrike consolidates all API-related documentation in one location to ensure consistent access and maintenance across Falcon modules. Identity Protection APIs are not documented under Falcon Management, Store, or general reference sections.

Because all product APIs---including Identity Protection---are documented under CrowdStrike APIs, Option D is the correct and verified answer.


Question 2

How does Identity Protection extend the capabilities of existing multi-factor authentication (MFA)?



Answer : A

Falcon Identity Protection is designed to extend---not replace---existing MFA solutions. According to the CCIS curriculum, Identity Protection enhances MFA by adding a risk-driven, policy-based enforcement layer that dynamically triggers MFA challenges when risky or abnormal identity behavior is detected.

Rather than applying MFA uniformly, Falcon evaluates authentication context such as behavioral deviation, privilege usage, and anomaly detection. When risk thresholds are exceeded, Policy Rules can enforce MFA through integrated connectors, providing adaptive, Zero Trust--aligned authentication.

The incorrect options misunderstand Falcon's role. Identity Protection does detect risky behavior, does not replace MFA providers, and fully supports both cloud and on-premises MFA connectors.

Because Falcon adds intelligence-driven enforcement on top of MFA, Option A is the correct and verified answer.


Question 3

How should a user be classified if one requires observation for potential risk to the business?



Answer : C

Within Falcon Identity Protection, a Watched User is a user explicitly designated for heightened monitoring due to potential business risk. According to the CCIS curriculum, watchlists are designed to provide additional visibility into users whose behavior, access level, or role may warrant closer observation, even if they have not yet exhibited confirmed malicious activity.

Watched Users may include executives, administrators, users with access to sensitive systems, or accounts suspected of being targeted. Placing a user on a watchlist does not imply compromise; instead, it ensures their activity is prioritized in investigations, detections, and dashboards.

The other options are incorrect:

Honeytoken Accounts are decoy accounts designed to detect malicious usage.

High Risk is a calculated risk state, not a monitoring classification.

Marked User is not a valid Falcon Identity Protection classification.

Because the CCIS material explicitly identifies Watched Users as accounts requiring observation for potential risk, Option C is the correct and verified answer.


Question 4

Which of the following IDaaS connectors will allow Identity to ingest cloud activity along with applying SSO Policy?



Answer : B

Falcon Identity Protection integrates with Identity-as-a-Service (IDaaS) providers to ingest cloud authentication activity and enforce identity-based policies. According to the CCIS curriculum, Okta SSO is a supported IDaaS connector that enables Falcon to ingest cloud authentication events while also applying Single Sign-On (SSO) policies.

Okta SSO provides rich identity telemetry, including login attempts, device context, and authentication outcomes. This data allows Falcon Identity Protection to correlate on-premises and cloud-based identity activity, extending identity risk analysis beyond Active Directory.

The other options are incorrect:

ADFS is an on-premises federation service, not a cloud IDaaS.

Azure NPS is used for RADIUS-based MFA, not SSO ingestion.

SAML is a protocol, not an IDaaS connector.

Because Okta SSO provides both cloud activity ingestion and SSO enforcement, Option B is the correct and verified answer.


Question 5

What setting can be switched under the Domain Security Overview for each Active Directory domain and/or Azure tenant?



Answer : D

In the Domain Security Overview, Scope is a configurable setting that allows administrators to switch between Active Directory domains and Azure tenants. This capability is essential for organizations managing multiple identity environments, as it enables targeted risk assessment and comparison across different identity infrastructures.

The CCIS documentation explains that Scope determines which domain or tenant's identity data is displayed in the Overview dashboard, including risk scores, trends, and prioritized remediation guidance. Changing the scope does not alter risk calculations; it simply refocuses the analysis on the selected identity environment.

Other options are incorrect because:

Privileged Identities represent a subset of users, not a switchable setting.

Domains are entities, not a dashboard control.

Goal changes how risks are evaluated, not which environment is displayed.

By allowing granular control over which domain or tenant is analyzed, Scope supports accurate identity risk management in complex, hybrid environments. Therefore, Option D is the correct answer.


Question 6

Which of the following MFA providers are NOT supported by Falcon Identity?



Answer : A

Falcon Identity Protection integrates with a defined set of supported MFA providers to enforce identity verification and conditional access based on identity risk. According to the CCIS curriculum, supported MFA providers include Azure (Entra) MFA, Cisco Duo, and Symantec VIP, which are commonly used enterprise-grade MFA solutions.

These integrations allow Falcon Identity Protection to evaluate authentication attempts and dynamically enforce MFA challenges when risky behavior is detected. The supported providers expose the necessary APIs and authentication workflows required for Falcon to trigger MFA challenges as part of Policy Rules and Zero Trust enforcement.

Firebase is not a supported MFA provider within Falcon Identity Protection. Firebase is primarily a mobile and application development platform and does not function as an enterprise MFA provider compatible with Falcon's identity enforcement model. As such, it cannot be used to enforce conditional access or identity verification through Falcon Identity Protection.

Because Falcon only supports specific, enterprise MFA integrations validated by CrowdStrike, Option A is the correct and verified answer.


Question 7

The CISO of your organization recently read a report about the increased usage of identity brokers and is interested in finding a solution for the company. Which of the following makes Falcon Identity a valid solution for the organization?



Answer : C

Falcon Identity Protection is designed to address the growing threat of identity brokers, which act as intermediaries that abuse identity infrastructure to facilitate lateral movement, privilege escalation, and persistent access. The CCIS curriculum emphasizes that Falcon Identity Protection provides proactive identity risk mitigation rather than reactive session monitoring or password vaulting.

The platform continuously inspects authentication traffic and identity behavior across Active Directory and Azure AD environments, building behavioral baselines and identifying abnormal activity associated with brokered identity attacks. Through Policy Rules, organizations can automatically enforce controls such as blocking risky authentications, enforcing MFA, or triggering remediation workflows when identity abuse is detected.

The incorrect options describe capabilities associated with Privileged Access Management (PAM) or IAM middleware, which are not the focus of Falcon Identity Protection. Falcon does not record interactive sessions, act as an HRIS bridge, or store delegated credentials. Instead, it protects identity infrastructure by detecting and preventing identity misuse in real time.

This proactive enforcement model aligns directly with Zero Trust principles and makes Falcon Identity Protection a strong solution against identity broker activity. Therefore, Option C is the correct and verified answer.


Page:    1 / 14   
Total 58 questions