Exin SIAM Professional SIAMP Exam Practice Test

Page: 1 / 14
Total 56 questions

Want more questions? Get Premium Access.
()

Question 1

SIAMRUS has created a report that suggests moving to several contracted service providers and an external service integrator ZYX has decided to separate the services into providers for.

- hosting

- networks

- application development and support

- desktop and laptop support

In order to avoid reliance on single providers, the CEO wants to use two different providers for each of these types of services. The CEO also wants to ensure that the costs for the service integrator are as low as possible

It is clear that there is a single structure needed for the service integrator contract.

Which contract structure is the most appropriate for ZYX?

AAdopt the same structure for the service provider contracts

BAdopt a single structure for the service provider contracts.

CAdopt a few different structures for the service provider contracts

DAdopt custom structures for each service provider contract

Answer : B

Contract Structure Importance: A single contract structure ensures consistency, simplifies management, and reduces complexity. This aligns with the CEO's goal of minimizing costs for the service integrator.

Multiple Providers: Using two providers for each service type necessitates clear and consistent contract terms to avoid confusion and ensure all providers operate under the same expectations and guidelines.

Consistency and Simplicity: A single structure across all service provider contracts ensures that all providers are subject to the same terms and conditions, making it easier for the service integrator to manage and enforce contracts.

Cost Management: Consistent contract structures streamline administration, reduce legal costs, and simplify the integration process, contributing to lower overall costs for the service integrator.

Avoiding Customization: Customizing contracts for each provider increases complexity and administrative overhead, which can lead to higher costs and potential inconsistencies in service delivery.

Conclusion: Adopting a single contract structure for all service providers is the most appropriate approach for ZYX, ensuring consistency, reducing complexity, and aligning with the CEO's objective of cost minimization.

SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Contract Management

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Governance and Contract Structure Sections

Question 2

rhe corporate strategy of ZYX contains these objectives

* Ensure delivery against contracts

Invest in and train all ZYX staff

Control staff costs

Reduce operating costs

Be ready to adapt to change

Fhe ZYX SIAM strategy including the outline business case and outline SIAM model, has been created by the ZYXH CIO It will be considered for approval at the next neetmg of the ZYX Board of Directors in one week.

rhe strategy proposes that:

SIAMRUS is the external service integrator

ZYXS. ZYXD and the development team from ZYXUK will form a new internal service provider, led by the current ZYXS IT Director

The ZYXS IT Director will continue to report to the ZYXH CFO in the new structure

The ZYXS IT Director has e mailed a formal complaint directly to the CEO about this strategy She believes that a hybnd service integrator structure, using capabilities from both SIAMRUS and ZYXS, would be a better option for ZYX

What should ZYXS do to get the ZYXS IT Director to buy into the SIAM strategy?

AAsk the ZYXH CFO and ZYXH CIO to meet with the ZYXS IT Director to understand her concerns

BCarry out an awareness campaign to brief all staff in ZYXS ZYXD, and ZYXUK

CRemind the ZYXS IT Director that the ZYX Board of Directors will make the final decision on the SIAM strategy

DResend copies of the outline business case and the outline SIAM model to the ZYXS IT Director

Answer : A

Introduction:

Addressing the concerns of the ZYXS IT Director is crucial for gaining buy-in and ensuring the successful implementation of the SIAM strategy.

Analyzing the Options:

Option A:

Involves a direct meeting with the ZYXH CFO and ZYXH CIO to understand and address the IT Director's concerns.

This approach fosters open communication and helps in addressing any valid concerns or objections.

Option B:

Suggests an awareness campaign to brief all staff.

While important, this does not specifically address the IT Director's concerns.

Option C:

Simply reminding the IT Director that the final decision lies with the Board may not address the root cause of the concerns.

Option D:

Resending documents may not address the underlying issues or concerns.

Conclusion:

Option A is the most effective approach as it ensures the IT Director's concerns are heard and addressed through direct communication with key decision-makers.

Question 3

Previously, there was no common set of performance targets and metrics used across all ZYX companies ZYXH Contract Governance is concerned about this. They would like to see metrics that drive improvement once the transition has been made to a SIAM model.

ZYXS provide a range of services to some ZYX companies The ZYX IT steering group meets every 4 months chaired by the ZYXS IT Director It is attended by representatives from each ZYX company SIAMRUS provided a report for ZYXUK. This included a set of metrics that SIAMRUS have used before with other organizations. ZYXS has been selected to be the internal service integrator in the new SIAM model The ZYXS IT director has provided a set of metrics from an organization that she previously worked for

What is the best way for ZYX to ensure effective metrics are in place to improve services?

AAt the next IT steering group meeting, agree on a common set of metrics that all service providers must use.

BProceed with the set of metrics that SIAMRUS has previously used with other service providers

CRun a pilot with metrics from the ZYXS IT director, involving ZYXS and all service providers

DTake the set of metrics currently used by ZYXS and apply them across all service providers

Answer : A

Current State Assessment: ZYX companies currently lack a unified set of performance targets and metrics, leading to inconsistent service performance assessments.

Governance and Alignment: Effective governance in a SIAM model requires standardized metrics to drive improvement across all service providers. This ensures comparability and unified improvement goals.

Stakeholder Engagement: Involving representatives from each ZYX company at the IT steering group meeting promotes buy-in and ensures the metrics are relevant and acceptable to all parties.

Internal vs. External Metrics: While external metrics provided by SIAMRUS or those from the ZYXS IT director can offer insights, they may not be fully aligned with ZYX's specific needs and context. Directly adopting these without consensus can lead to misalignment and resistance.

Pilot Testing: Running a pilot with metrics from the ZYXS IT director could provide practical insights but does not guarantee consensus or applicability across all service providers.

Common Metrics Agreement: By agreeing on a common set of metrics in a collaborative forum (the IT steering group meeting), ZYX ensures these metrics are tailored, accepted, and effective in driving improvements across the board.

SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Performance Management

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Metrics and Reporting Sections

Question 4

ZYX has implemented a SIAM structure, appointing SIAMRUS as the service integrator.

The SIAM strategy is to consolidate to a smaller number of service providers over time as existing contracts expire Until then. ZYX wants all current service providers to be part of the SIAM ecosystem.

What should ZYX do?

ACommunicate the SIAM strategy and instruct SIAMRUS to speak to all service providers to explain their role

BDraw up a collaboration agreement across all service providers setting out how they will work together

CPut a clause in service provider contracts that SIAMRUS is acting on behalf of ZYX or negotiate themselves

DWrite to all the service providers informing them that SIAMRUS has been appointed as the service integrator

Answer : B

SIAM Strategy Communication: Clearly communicating the SIAM strategy ensures all service providers understand the new operational model and their roles within it.

Collaboration Agreement: Creating a collaboration agreement formalizes the expectations, roles, and responsibilities of all service providers, promoting a cooperative environment.

Role Clarification: The collaboration agreement ensures that SIAMRUS's role as the service integrator is well-defined and accepted by all service providers, preventing conflicts and misunderstandings.

Contractual Inclusion: While incorporating clauses in service provider contracts acknowledging SIAMRUS's role is essential, it is part of a broader strategy and not a standalone solution.

Formal Notifications: Informing service providers via official communication about SIAMRUS's appointment is necessary but insufficient without a collaboration framework.

Implementation Framework: The collaboration agreement serves as a foundational document, aligning all service providers with the SIAM strategy and ensuring they work towards common goals.

SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Collaboration and Cooperation

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Governance and Contract Management Sections

Question 5

The SIAM Project Board has decided that the service integrator will be external. The external service integrator has been charged with establishing the governance framework to monitor and measure performance of the ZYX SIAM ecosystem

What will contribute most to the complexity of the governance framework??

AZYX's merger with a Japanese competitor

BZYXD's job descriptions and operating procedures

CZYXG's IT strategy and local service providers

DZYXUK's lack of attendance at the Change Approval Forum

Answer : A

Introduction:

The complexity of the governance framework in a SIAM ecosystem can be influenced by various factors.

Analyzing the Options:

Option A:

ZYX's merger with a Japanese competitor.

Mergers typically introduce significant complexity due to differences in organizational cultures, processes, and systems.

Option B:

ZYXD's job descriptions and operating procedures.

While relevant, this does not add as much complexity as a merger.

Option C:

ZYXG's IT strategy and local service providers.

Important, but not as impactful on governance complexity as a merger.

Option D:

ZYXUK's lack of attendance at the Change Approval Forum.

Significant for specific processes but not the most complex factor overall.

Conclusion:

Option A (ZYX's merger with a Japanese competitor) will contribute most to the complexity of the governance framework due to the integration challenges it poses.

Question 6

The ZYXS IT Director has proposed to the CIO that ZYXS should be the service integrator in the new SIAM model. The CIO wants to validate if the necessary capabilities exist in ZYXS. The CIO has asked SIAMRUS to perform the assessment.

What is the first activity that SIAMRUS should carry out?

ACompare the ZYXS service integration capabilities with the SIAM objectives and the target SIAM model

BAssess the existing capabilities of each team in ZYXS and determine if they are at the required maturity

CIdentify and then map the stakeholders, process owners and managers for all services across ZYX

DPrepare a heat map to provide a graphical summary of capabilities and show it to the CIO

Answer : A

Objective and Context:

The ZYXS IT Director proposes ZYXS as the service integrator in the new SIAM model.

The CIO needs to validate if ZYXS possesses the necessary capabilities.

Assessment of Capabilities:

SIAMRUS must begin by comparing the current service integration capabilities of ZYXS with the defined SIAM objectives and the target SIAM model.

This involves identifying the specific capabilities required for the target SIAM model and evaluating whether ZYXS meets these requirements.

Alignment with SIAM Objectives:

This comparison ensures that ZYXS can fulfill the roles and responsibilities expected of the service integrator, in line with the overall goals of the SIAM implementation.

Initial Activity:

This step serves as the foundation for understanding gaps and strengths, which will guide further detailed assessments and development plans if necessary.

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Capability Assessment

ITIL 4: Direct, Plan and Improve (DPI), Section on Continual Improvement

Question 7

ZYXS service management currently operates a Change Approval Forum (CAF): which is chaired by the ZYXS Service Management and Service Desk Lead, and is meant to be attended by user representatives from each ZYX company.

- In the new SIAM model ZYX is considering using SIAMRUS as the service integrator

- ZYX plans to keep all current service providers, renegotiating and extending contracts where necessary.

- OUTSCO will continue to provide the services for users in ZYXUK

- ZYXS, ZYXD, and the application development team from ZYXUK will become internal service providers

The SIAMRUS SIAM model includes a process model for change management. In this model. SIAMRUS will hold an Integrated Change Advisory Board (ICAB) meeting every two weeks, where proposed changes to the services and systems will be reviewed before approval SIAMRUS will mandate the use of their change management toolset by all service providers

The CIO is concerned that some of the current service providers may not comply with the SIAMRUS process model for change management

Which organizations are most likely to not comply and why?

ACADSCO, FIELD$CO and MAIL$CO. because commodity service providers provide services to multiple customers

BOUTSCO, because they use a commodity cloud-based service to monitor the ZYXUK networks and infrastructure

CZYXS, because their Service Management and Service Desk Leadis the chair of the current ZYXS CAF

DZYXUK, because there is no need for the development team to attend the ICAB as they are an internal service provider

Answer : A

Context Understanding: In the new SIAM model, SIAMRUS will hold an Integrated Change Advisory Board (ICAB) and mandate the use of their change management toolset by all service providers.

Commodity Service Providers: Providers like CADSCO, FIELDSCO, and MAILSCO, which offer commodity services to multiple customers, often have standardized processes that may not align easily with customized SIAM requirements.

Compliance Challenges: These providers may face challenges in complying with specific SIAMRUS processes and tools due to their broad customer base and standardized operations, making it difficult to adapt to specific requirements for ZYX.

Service Integrator Role: The service integrator (SIAMRUS) needs to ensure that all providers adhere to the integrated change management process, but commodity providers may be less flexible in adopting new tools and processes.

Impact on Compliance: While internal providers like ZYXS, ZYXD, and the ZYXUK development team are more likely to comply due to their closer alignment with ZYX's internal processes, commodity providers have less incentive and flexibility to adapt.

Conclusion: CADSCO, FIELDSCO, and MAILSCO are most likely to face compliance issues due to their standardized, multi-customer service models, making them less adaptable to specific SIAMRUS process requirements.

SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Process Management and Integration

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Change Management and Governance Sections