Exin SIAMP EXIN SIAM Professional Exam Practice Test

Page: 1 / 14
Total 56 questions

Want more questions? Get Premium Access.
()

Question 1

ZYX is initiating their NEWGEN SIAM transition project As part of the early planning, ZYX identifies key activities and milestones that must be included in the project plan.

What would be the best approach for ZYX to take in designing their SIAM governance framework?

ADefine a framework of formally appointed governance boards with clearly documented terms of reference to act as decision making bodies, made up of representatives from all divisions of ZYX

BEnsure that the future service integrator's contract includes responsibility for establishing a governance framework that describes how the SIAM ecosystem will be managed and operated

CEstablish a working group with representation from all ZYX divisions to review existing policies and practices, then define a framework of policies, standards processes, roles and structural elements

DUpdate the responsibilities of the IT Steering Group to include responsibility for ensuring that the SIAM ecosystem is implemented in accordance with defined plans and objectives

Answer : C

Governance Framework Design:

Establishing a comprehensive governance framework is crucial for the success of the SIAM transition project.

Inclusive Working Group:

A working group that includes representation from all ZYX divisions ensures that the governance framework is inclusive and considers the needs and perspectives of all stakeholders.

This collaborative approach fosters buy-in and alignment across the organization.

Review and Define Framework:

The working group should begin by reviewing existing policies and practices to identify areas that need to be aligned with the new SIAM model.

They will then define a framework that includes policies, standards, processes, roles, and structural elements necessary for effective governance.

Benefits:

This method ensures that the governance framework is well-rounded, comprehensive, and tailored to the specific needs of ZYX.

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Governance Framework

ITIL 4: Direct, Plan and Improve (DPI), Section on Governance

Question 2

The SIAM Project Board has decided that a big bang implementation approach is unsuitable for ZYX

What is the most likely reason for this decision?

AAgile methods cannot be applied to a big bang implementation approach.

BThe current service provider contracts have different termination periods.

CThe service levels must be maintained throughout the entire transition

DThe ZYXUK Directors want to use the approach suggested by SIAMRUS

Answer : B

Understanding Big Bang Implementation: A big bang implementation approach involves transitioning all service elements simultaneously. This method is swift but high-risk, particularly when dealing with multiple service providers.

Contractual Considerations: Different service providers often have contracts ending at various times. Aligning all these to terminate simultaneously for a big bang approach is challenging and impractical. This mismatch in termination periods means that transitioning all services at once would likely lead to contract breaches, penalties, or service disruption.

Agile Methods Applicability: Agile methods focus on iterative and incremental delivery rather than a single, all-encompassing change. Although Agile could be challenging in a big bang approach, it's not the primary reason for ZYX's decision.

Service Level Maintenance: Maintaining consistent service levels is critical during any transition. A phased approach ensures better control and less disruption, ensuring continuous service delivery.

Strategic Alignment: Although the preferences of directors and external suggestions (like from SIAMRUS) influence decisions, they are not the fundamental reasons behind avoiding a big bang approach.

Conclusion: The core issue lies in the contractual termination periods, making a phased implementation more feasible and less risky.

SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Implementation Approaches

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Contract Management Sections

Question 3

rhe corporate strategy of ZYX contains these objectives

* Ensure delivery against contracts

Invest in and train all ZYX staff

Control staff costs

Reduce operating costs

Be ready to adapt to change

Fhe ZYX SIAM strategy including the outline business case and outline SIAM model, has been created by the ZYXH CIO It will be considered for approval at the next neetmg of the ZYX Board of Directors in one week.

rhe strategy proposes that:

SIAMRUS is the external service integrator

ZYXS. ZYXD and the development team from ZYXUK will form a new internal service provider, led by the current ZYXS IT Director

The ZYXS IT Director will continue to report to the ZYXH CFO in the new structure

The ZYXS IT Director has e mailed a formal complaint directly to the CEO about this strategy She believes that a hybnd service integrator structure, using capabilities from both SIAMRUS and ZYXS, would be a better option for ZYX

What should ZYXS do to get the ZYXS IT Director to buy into the SIAM strategy?

AAsk the ZYXH CFO and ZYXH CIO to meet with the ZYXS IT Director to understand her concerns

BCarry out an awareness campaign to brief all staff in ZYXS ZYXD, and ZYXUK

CRemind the ZYXS IT Director that the ZYX Board of Directors will make the final decision on the SIAM strategy

DResend copies of the outline business case and the outline SIAM model to the ZYXS IT Director

Answer : A

Introduction:

Addressing the concerns of the ZYXS IT Director is crucial for gaining buy-in and ensuring the successful implementation of the SIAM strategy.

Analyzing the Options:

Option A:

Involves a direct meeting with the ZYXH CFO and ZYXH CIO to understand and address the IT Director's concerns.

This approach fosters open communication and helps in addressing any valid concerns or objections.

Option B:

Suggests an awareness campaign to brief all staff.

While important, this does not specifically address the IT Director's concerns.

Option C:

Simply reminding the IT Director that the final decision lies with the Board may not address the root cause of the concerns.

Option D:

Resending documents may not address the underlying issues or concerns.

Conclusion:

Option A is the most effective approach as it ensures the IT Director's concerns are heard and addressed through direct communication with key decision-makers.

Question 4

SIAMRUS has created a report that suggests moving to several contracted service providers and an external service integrator ZYX has decided to separate the services into providers for.

- hosting

- networks

- application development and support

- desktop and laptop support

In order to avoid reliance on single providers, the CEO wants to use two different providers for each of these types of services. The CEO also wants to ensure that the costs for the service integrator are as low as possible

It is clear that there is a single structure needed for the service integrator contract.

Which contract structure is the most appropriate for ZYX?

AAdopt the same structure for the service provider contracts

BAdopt a single structure for the service provider contracts.

CAdopt a few different structures for the service provider contracts

DAdopt custom structures for each service provider contract

Answer : B

Contract Structure Importance: A single contract structure ensures consistency, simplifies management, and reduces complexity. This aligns with the CEO's goal of minimizing costs for the service integrator.

Multiple Providers: Using two providers for each service type necessitates clear and consistent contract terms to avoid confusion and ensure all providers operate under the same expectations and guidelines.

Consistency and Simplicity: A single structure across all service provider contracts ensures that all providers are subject to the same terms and conditions, making it easier for the service integrator to manage and enforce contracts.

Cost Management: Consistent contract structures streamline administration, reduce legal costs, and simplify the integration process, contributing to lower overall costs for the service integrator.

Avoiding Customization: Customizing contracts for each provider increases complexity and administrative overhead, which can lead to higher costs and potential inconsistencies in service delivery.

Conclusion: Adopting a single contract structure for all service providers is the most appropriate approach for ZYX, ensuring consistency, reducing complexity, and aligning with the CEO's objective of cost minimization.

SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Contract Management

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Governance and Contract Structure Sections

Question 5

ZYX have decided to use the external service integrator structure The ZYX CEO wants to minimize risks to service availability. In order to avoid reliance on single service providers the CEO wants to use four different providers for hosting There will be one service provider for hosting for each of the following countries

- the UK

- Germany

- the Netherlands

- Australia

To provide resilience every application used by ZYX will be hosted by three different hosting service providers

The CEO wants to ensure a rapid introduction of new services and service providers She also wants to ensure that the costs for the service integrator are as low as possible The ZYXH legal team does not want to make the drafting of the contracts more difficult than necessary

It is clear that there is a single structure needed for the service integrator contract

Which contract structure is the most appropriate for ZYX?

AAdopt that same structure for the hosting provider contracts

BAdopt a single structure for the hosting provider contracts

CAdopt custom structures for each hosting provider contract

DAsk the hosting providers to provide their own structure.

Answer : B

Understanding the Scenario:

ZYX wants to minimize risks to service availability by using four different providers for hosting in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, and Australia.

Each application will be hosted by three different providers to ensure resilience.

The CEO aims for rapid introduction of new services, low costs for the service integrator, and simplified contract drafting.

Analyzing the Options:

Option A: Adopting the same structure for all hosting provider contracts might reduce complexity but doesn't address the requirement for a single contract structure.

Option C: Custom structures for each hosting provider contract would complicate the contract drafting process, going against the legal team's preference.

Option D: Allowing hosting providers to provide their own structure would lead to inconsistencies and difficulties in managing multiple contracts.

Selecting the Optimal Approach:

Option B: Adopting a single structure for all hosting provider contracts ensures consistency, simplifies the management process, and aligns with the legal team's requirement to avoid complexity in contract drafting. It also supports rapid service introduction and cost efficiency by streamlining contract management.

Justification:

A single contract structure facilitates easier management and integration across different providers, which is critical for maintaining service resilience and availability.

This approach aligns with SIAM principles of consistent and streamlined service integration and management.

Question 6

Previously, there was no common set of performance targets and metrics used across all ZYX companies ZYXH Contract Governance is concerned about this. They would like to see metrics that drive improvement once the transition has been made to a SIAM model.

ZYXS provide a range of services to some ZYX companies The ZYX IT steering group meets every 4 months chaired by the ZYXS IT Director It is attended by representatives from each ZYX company SIAMRUS provided a report for ZYXUK. This included a set of metrics that SIAMRUS have used before with other organizations. ZYXS has been selected to be the internal service integrator in the new SIAM model The ZYXS IT director has provided a set of metrics from an organization that she previously worked for

What is the best way for ZYX to ensure effective metrics are in place to improve services?

AAt the next IT steering group meeting, agree on a common set of metrics that all service providers must use.

BProceed with the set of metrics that SIAMRUS has previously used with other service providers

CRun a pilot with metrics from the ZYXS IT director, involving ZYXS and all service providers

DTake the set of metrics currently used by ZYXS and apply them across all service providers

Answer : A

Current State Assessment: ZYX companies currently lack a unified set of performance targets and metrics, leading to inconsistent service performance assessments.

Governance and Alignment: Effective governance in a SIAM model requires standardized metrics to drive improvement across all service providers. This ensures comparability and unified improvement goals.

Stakeholder Engagement: Involving representatives from each ZYX company at the IT steering group meeting promotes buy-in and ensures the metrics are relevant and acceptable to all parties.

Internal vs. External Metrics: While external metrics provided by SIAMRUS or those from the ZYXS IT director can offer insights, they may not be fully aligned with ZYX's specific needs and context. Directly adopting these without consensus can lead to misalignment and resistance.

Pilot Testing: Running a pilot with metrics from the ZYXS IT director could provide practical insights but does not guarantee consensus or applicability across all service providers.

Common Metrics Agreement: By agreeing on a common set of metrics in a collaborative forum (the IT steering group meeting), ZYX ensures these metrics are tailored, accepted, and effective in driving improvements across the board.

SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Performance Management

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Metrics and Reporting Sections

Question 7

ZYX has appointed a service integrator in addition to measunng specific service provider service levels, the ZYX Board of Directors also wants information on end-to-end process KPIs based on business outcomes

The KPIs that the ZYX Board would like are

- End-to-end availability of services supporting sales activity

- End-to-end resolution time for support requests received from users

- Timeliness of invoice production, distribution and payment

How should the service integrator implement these KPIs?

ABring the providers together to map the services, and define and agree on the supporting measurements

BEngage a team of consultants from SIAMRUS to map the processes and define the calculations required

CReview the existing KPIs used by all providers to see which ones can be used as the new KPIs

DRequest ZYX to produce data definitions and distnbute these to the service providers

Answer : A

Understanding the Scenario:

ZYX has appointed a service integrator and wants to measure end-to-end process KPIs based on business outcomes.

The desired KPIs include end-to-end availability of services supporting sales, resolution time for support requests, and timeliness of invoice processing.

Analyzing the Options:

Option B: Engaging consultants from SIAMRUS may provide expertise but could be costly and time-consuming.

Option C: Reviewing existing KPIs might not cover all the necessary business outcomes and could miss specific requirements.

Option D: Requesting ZYX to produce data definitions could lead to inconsistencies and may not ensure provider alignment.

Selecting the Optimal Approach:

Option A: Bringing the providers together to map the services and define and agree on the supporting measurements ensures alignment and collaboration. This approach fosters a common understanding and commitment to the KPIs across all providers, facilitating accurate and meaningful measurements.

Justification:

Collaborative mapping and agreement on KPIs ensure that all providers understand their roles and responsibilities in achieving business outcomes.

This approach aligns with SIAM principles of collaborative governance and integrated service management, ensuring that KPIs are relevant and aligned with business objectives.