Finra Securities Industry Essentials SIE Exam Questions

Answer : D

Answer : C

Under FINRA Rule 2150, registered representatives may share in profits and losses in a customer's account if:

The customer provides written consent.

The arrangement is approved by the RR's firm.

The sharing is proportional to the RR's financial contribution.

C is correct because it aligns with FINRA requirements.

A, B, and D are incorrect because they do not meet the necessary conditions for sharing.

Answer : A

When interest rates rise, existing bond prices generally fall, and this relationship applies to municipal bonds just as it does to Treasuries and corporate bonds. The reason is competitive pricing in the market: newly issued bonds come to market offering higher yields (because prevailing rates are higher). To remain attractive, older bonds with lower coupon rates must trade at discounted prices so that their yield to an investor purchasing them today rises to a competitive level. Therefore, an increase in interest rates typically causes a decrease in the market price of an existing municipal bond, making choice A correct.

Choice B is the opposite of the correct interest-rate/price relationship. Choice C and D are incorrect because the question asks about the effect on a municipal bond already issued. The bond's coupon rate (the stated interest rate on the bond) is fixed at issuance for most standard municipal bonds; market interest rates changing does not retroactively change the bond's coupon. What changes is the bond's market price and therefore its yield in the secondary market.

This concept is core SIE bond math/relationships: price and yield move inversely, and bond sensitivity to rate changes increases with longer maturities and lower coupons (i.e., more duration). Municipal bonds also carry other risks (credit, call/prepayment features, liquidity), but the direct effect of a general rise in interest rates is a market-price decline due to the need to adjust yields to current levels. The SIE outline specifically expects understanding of debt instruments and the relationship between price and interest rates.

Answer : A

A preliminary prospectus (often called a ''red herring'') is used in a registered public offering---such as an IPO---before the final offering price and certain final terms are set. It typically contains extensive information about the issuer, including its business description, risk factors, intended use of proceeds, management, capitalization, and importantly, details about ownership and shareholdings (e.g., principal shareholders, insiders, and how ownership may change post-offering). That makes A (Ownership structure) the correct answer.

Choice B is incorrect because ''anticipated trading volume'' is not a standard required disclosure item in a preliminary prospectus. While a prospectus may discuss market and listing information, projected trading volume is speculative and generally not presented as a typical disclosure item. Choice C is incorrect because the SEC does not approve the merits of an offering; securities regulation is rooted in disclosure, not merit review. The SEC's role is to require that material information is disclosed so investors can make informed decisions---not to judge whether the investment is ''good.'' Choice D is incorrect because FINRA does not ''determine'' a preliminary prospectus is accurate in that way; FINRA's corporate financing review is focused on underwriting terms and arrangements for fairness/reasonableness under applicable rules, not certifying accuracy of issuer disclosures.

This question targets core SIE offering concepts: what a prospectus contains, what ''red herring'' means, and the principle that regulators require full and fair disclosure rather than guaranteeing investment quality.

Answer : B

FINRA rules restrict allocations of shares in certain equity IPOs to prevent improper practices and conflicts of interest, especially involving industry insiders and ''restricted persons.'' However, institutional customers are generally permitted to purchase IPO shares, subject to the firm's allocation policies and applicable restrictions. Therefore, the best answer is B.

Choice A is problematic because a bank portfolio manager purchasing ''for their own account'' may fall into restricted categories depending on role and affiliations; the phrasing suggests a financial industry professional acting personally, which raises restricted person concerns. Choice C is also generally restricted: persons associated with a broker-dealer (even in a non-registered role) may be considered restricted persons for IPO allocations, depending on the specifics, because the rule is designed to keep IPO shares from being funneled to industry insiders who could benefit improperly. Choice D is similarly suspicious because registered representatives at any broker-dealer may be restricted from buying IPO shares for their own accounts even if their firm is not involved in the offering; the restriction focuses on associated persons and conflicts, not just participation in the specific deal.

On the SIE, the tested concept is that IPO allocations are subject to rules designed to protect fairness and prevent ''spinning'' or insider favoritism. Institutional customers are generally not the prohibited category in this set of options, making them the clean permitted choice.

Answer : A

A trust account best meets the mother's objective because a trust can be structured to control distributions and restrict the beneficiary's access to funds. By establishing a trust, the mother (as grantor) can define terms such as when the son may receive distributions, what the funds may be used for (e.g., education only), and who has the authority to approve withdrawals (the trustee). This directly addresses the stated goal: making annual gifts while preventing the son from withdrawing funds for living expenses. Therefore, A is correct.

A separately managed account (choice B) is an investment management arrangement, not a legal structure designed to restrict a beneficiary's access. It focuses on portfolio management and customization, but it does not inherently prevent the account owner (or someone with authority) from accessing funds, and it does not solve the ''no withdrawals for living expenses'' objective the way a trust can.

A Coverdell ESA (choice C) is intended for education expenses and has tax-advantaged features, but it is not the best answer because the mother's objective is broader: she wants to make yearly gifts and restrict withdrawals generally (especially for living expenses). While a Coverdell can constrain qualified use and impose penalties for nonqualified withdrawals, it is still an education account with specific rules and limits rather than a flexible legal mechanism to restrict access across circumstances. A JTWROS account (choice D) is especially wrong for this objective because a joint owner typically has immediate rights to the assets, meaning the son could withdraw funds.

SIE-wise, this is an account registration/control questio n: trusts are the primary tool for controlling who can access assets and under what terms, making them ideal when the goal is to give assets but restrict the beneficiary's spending access.

Answer : D

529 savings plans are state-sponsored education savings accounts that offer tax-advantaged growth. Key features include:

Contributions are not federally tax deductible (some states offer state-level deductions).

No income limitations for contributions.

The account owner, not the beneficiary, controls the plan.

Assets can be transferred tax-free to another family member's 529 plan.

D is correct because tax-free rollovers are allowed for family members of the current beneficiary.

A is incorrect as contributions are not universally tax deductible.

B is incorrect as there are no income limitations for contributing.

C is incorrect because the account owner, not the beneficiary, controls the assets.