Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Questions

Page: 1 / 14
Total 283 questions
Question 1

You want to migrate a scikrt-learn classifier model to TensorFlow. You plan to train the TensorFlow classifier model using the same training set that was used to train the scikit-learn model and then compare the performances using a common test set. You want to use the Vertex Al Python SDK to manually log the evaluation metrics of each model and compare them based on their F1 scores and confusion matrices. How should you log the metrics?



Answer : D

To log the metrics of a machine learning model in TensorFlow using the Vertex AI Python SDK, you should utilize theaiplatform.log_metricsfunction to log the F1 score andaiplatform.log_classification_metricsfunction to log the confusion matrix. These functions allow users to manually record and store evaluation metrics for each model, facilitating an efficient comparison based on specific performance indicators like F1 scores and confusion matrices.Reference: The answer can be verified from official Google Cloud documentation and resources related to Vertex AI and TensorFlow.

Vertex AI Python SDK reference | Google Cloud

Logging custom metrics | Vertex AI

Migrating from scikit-learn to TensorFlow | TensorFlow


Question 2

You are working on a classification problem with time series data and achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) value of 99% for training data after just a few experiments. You haven't explored using any sophisticated algorithms or spent any time on hyperparameter tuning. What should your next step be to identify and fix the problem?



Answer : B

Data leakage is a problem where information from outside the training dataset is used to create the model, resulting in an overly optimistic or invalid estimate of the model performance. Data leakage can occur in time series data when the temporal order of the data is not preserved during data preparation or model evaluation. For example, if the data is shuffled before splitting into train and test sets, or if future data is used to impute missing values in past data, then data leakage can occur.

One way to address data leakage in time series data is to apply nested cross-validation during model training. Nested cross-validation is a technique that allows you to perform both model selection and model evaluation in a robust way, while preserving the temporal order of the data. Nested cross-validation involves two levels of cross-validation: an inner loop for model selection and an outer loop for model evaluation. The inner loop splits the training data into k folds, trains and tunes the model on k-1 folds, and validates the model on the remaining fold. The inner loop repeats this process for each fold and selects the best model based on the validation performance. The outer loop splits the data into n folds, trains the best model from the inner loop on n-1 folds, and tests the model on the remaining fold. The outer loop repeats this process for each fold and evaluates the model performance based on the test results.

Nested cross-validation can help to avoid data leakage in time series data by ensuring that the model is trained and tested on non-overlapping data, and that the data used for validation is never seen by the model during training. Nested cross-validation can also provide a more reliable estimate of the model performance than a single train-test split or a simple cross-validation, as it reduces the variance and bias of the estimate.


Data Leakage in Machine Learning

How to Avoid Data Leakage When Performing Data Preparation

Classification on a single time series - prevent leakage between train and test

Question 3

You work for an online travel agency that also sells advertising placements on its website to other companies.

You have been asked to predict the most relevant web banner that a user should see next. Security is

important to your company. The model latency requirements are 300ms@p99, the inventory is thousands of web banners, and your exploratory analysis has shown that navigation context is a good predictor. You want to Implement the simplest solution. How should you configure the prediction pipeline?



Answer : A

In this scenario, the goal is to predict the most relevant web banner that a user should see next on an online travel agency's website. The model needs to have low latency requirements of 300ms@p99, and there are thousands of web banners to choose from. The exploratory analysis has shown that the navigation context is a good predictor. Security is also important to the company. Given these requirements, the best configuration for the prediction pipeline would be to embed the client on the website and deploy the model on AI Platform Prediction. Option A is the correct answer.

Option A: Embed the client on the website, and then deploy the model on AI Platform Prediction. This option is the simplest solution that meets the requirements. The client can collect the user's navigation context and send it to the model deployed on AI Platform Prediction for prediction. AI Platform Prediction can handle large-scale prediction requests and has low latency requirements. This option does not require any additional infrastructure or services, making it the simplest solution.

Option B: Embed the client on the website, deploy the gateway on App Engine, and then deploy the model on AI Platform Prediction. This option adds an additional layer of infrastructure by deploying the gateway on App Engine. While App Engine can handle large-scale requests, it adds complexity to the pipeline and may not be necessary for this use case.

Option C: Embed the client on the website, deploy the gateway on App Engine, deploy the database on Cloud Bigtable for writing and for reading the user's navigation context, and then deploy the model on AI Platform Prediction. This option adds even more complexity to the pipeline by deploying the database on Cloud Bigtable. While Cloud Bigtable can provide fast and scalable access to the user's navigation context, it may not be needed for this use case. Moreover, Cloud Bigtable may introduce additional latency and cost to the pipeline.

Option D: Embed the client on the website, deploy the gateway on App Engine, deploy the database on Memorystore for writing and for reading the user's navigation context, and then deploy the model on Google Kubernetes Engine. This option is the most complex and costly solution that does not meet the requirements. Deploying the model on Google Kubernetes Engine requires more management and configuration than AI Platform Prediction. Moreover, Google Kubernetes Engine may not be able to meet the low latency requirements of 300ms@p99. Deploying the database on Memorystore also adds unnecessary overhead and cost to the pipeline.


AI Platform Prediction documentation

App Engine documentation

Cloud Bigtable documentation

[Memorystore documentation]

[Google Kubernetes Engine documentation]

Question 4

You work on a team that builds state-of-the-art deep learning models by using the TensorFlow framework. Your team runs multiple ML experiments each week which makes it difficult to track the experiment runs. You want a simple approach to effectively track, visualize and debug ML experiment runs on Google Cloud while minimizing any overhead code. How should you proceed?



Answer : A

Vertex AI Experiments is a service that allows you to track, compare, and optimize your ML experiments on Google Cloud. You can use Vertex AI Experiments to log metrics and parameters from your TensorFlow models, and then visualize them in Vertex AI TensorBoard. Vertex AI TensorBoard is a managed service that provides a web interface for viewing and debugging your ML experiments. You can use Vertex AI TensorBoard to compare different runs, inspect model graphs, analyze scalars, histograms, images, and more. By using Vertex AI Experiments and Vertex AI TensorBoard, you can simplify your ML experiment tracking and visualization workflow, and avoid the overhead of setting up and maintaining your own Cloud Functions, Cloud Storage buckets, or VMs.Reference:

[Vertex AI Experiments documentation]

[Vertex AI TensorBoard documentation]

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate


Question 5

You need to quickly build and train a model to predict the sentiment of customer reviews with custom categories without writing code. You do not have enough data to train a model from scratch. The resulting model should have high predictive performance. Which service should you use?



Answer : A

AutoML Natural Language is a service that allows you to build and train custom natural language models without writing code. You can use AutoML Natural Language to perform sentiment analysis with custom categories, such as positive, negative, or neutral. You can also use pre-trained models or transfer learning to leverage existing knowledge and reduce the amount of data required to train a model from scratch. AutoML Natural Language provides a user-friendly interface and a powerful AutoML engine that optimizes your model for high predictive performance.

Cloud Natural Language API is a service that provides pre-trained models for common natural language tasks, such as sentiment analysis, entity analysis, and syntax analysis. However, it does not allow you to customize the categories or use your own data for training.

AI Hub pre-made Jupyter Notebooks are interactive documents that contain code, text, and visualizations for various machine learning scenarios. However, they require some coding skills and data preparation to use them effectively.

AI Platform Training built-in algorithms are pre-configured machine learning algorithms that you can use to train models on AI Platform. However, they do not support sentiment analysis as a natural language task.


AutoML Natural Language documentation

Cloud Natural Language API documentation

AI Hub documentation

AI Platform Training documentation

Question 6

You deployed an ML model into production a year ago. Every month, you collect all raw requests that were sent to your model prediction service during the previous month. You send a subset of these requests to a human labeling service to evaluate your model's performance. After a year, you notice that your model's performance sometimes degrades significantly after a month, while other times it takes several months to notice any decrease in performance. The labeling service is costly, but you also need to avoid large performance degradations. You want to determine how often you should retrain your model to maintain a high level of performance while minimizing cost. What should you do?



Answer : D

The best option for determining how often to retrain your model to maintain a high level of performance while minimizing cost is to run training-serving skew detection batch jobs every few days. Training-serving skew refers to the discrepancy between the distributions of the features in the training dataset and the serving data. This can cause the model to perform poorly on the new data, as it is not representative of the data that the model was trained on. By running training-serving skew detection batch jobs, you can monitor the changes in the feature distributions over time, and identify when the skew becomes significant enough to affect the model performance. If skew is detected, you can send the most recent serving data to the labeling service, and use the labeled data to retrain your model. This option has the following benefits:

It allows you to retrain your model only when necessary, based on the actual data changes, rather than on a fixed schedule or a heuristic. This can save you the cost of the labeling service and the retraining process, and also avoid overfitting or underfitting your model.

It leverages the existing tools and frameworks for training-serving skew detection, such as TensorFlow Data Validation (TFDV) and Vertex Data Labeling. TFDV is a library that can compute and visualize descriptive statistics for your datasets, and compare the statistics across different datasets. Vertex Data Labeling is a service that can label your data with high quality and low latency, using either human labelers or automated labelers.

It integrates well with the MLOps practices, such as continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD), which can automate the workflow of running the skew detection jobs, sending the data to the labeling service, retraining the model, and deploying the new model version.

The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:

Option A: Training an anomaly detection model on the training dataset, and running all incoming requests through this model, introduces additional complexity and overhead. This option requires building and maintaining a separate model for anomaly detection, which can be challenging and time-consuming. Moreover, this option requires running the anomaly detection model on every request, which can increase the latency and resource consumption of the prediction service. Additionally, this option may not capture the subtle changes in the feature distributions that can affect the model performance, as anomalies are usually defined as rare or extreme events.

Option B: Identifying temporal patterns in your model's performance over the previous year, and creating a schedule for sending serving data to the labeling service for the next year, introduces additional assumptions and risks. This option requires analyzing the historical data and model performance, and finding the patterns that can explain the variations in the model performance over time. However, this can be difficult and unreliable, as the patterns may not be consistent or predictable, and may depend on various factors that are not captured by the data. Moreover, this option requires creating a schedule based on the past patterns, which may not reflect the future changes in the data or the environment. This can lead to either sending too much or too little data to the labeling service, resulting in either wasted cost or degraded performance.

Option C: Comparing the cost of the labeling service with the lost revenue due to model performance degradation over the past year, and adjusting the frequency of model retraining accordingly, introduces additional challenges and trade-offs. This option requires estimating the cost of the labeling service and the lost revenue due to model performance degradation, which can be difficult and inaccurate, as they may depend on various factors that are not easily quantifiable or measurable. Moreover, this option requires finding the optimal balance between the cost and the performance, which can be subjective and variable, as different stakeholders may have different preferences and expectations. Furthermore, this option may not account for the potential impact of the model performance degradation on other aspects of the business, such as customer satisfaction, retention, or loyalty.


Question 7

You work for a gaming company that manages a popular online multiplayer game where teams with 6 players play against each other in 5-minute battles. There are many new players every day. You need to build a model that automatically assigns available players to teams in real time. User research indicates that the game is more enjoyable when battles have players with similar skill levels. Which business metrics should you track to measure your model's performance? (Choose One Correct Answer)



Answer : C

The best business metric to track to measure the model's performance is user engagement as measured by the number of battles played daily per user. This metric reflects the main goal of the model, which is to enhance the user experience and satisfaction by creating balanced and fair battles. If the model is successful, it should increase the user retention and loyalty, as well as the word-of-mouth and referrals. This metric is also easy to measure and interpret, as it can be directly obtained from the user activity data.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

A . Average time players wait before being assigned to a team is not a good metric, as it does not capture the quality or outcome of the battles. It only measures the efficiency of the model, which is not the primary objective. Moreover, this metric can be influenced by external factors, such as the availability and demand of players, the network latency, and the server capacity.

B . Precision and recall of assigning players to teams based on their predicted versus actual ability is not a good metric, as it is difficult to measure and interpret. It requires having a reliable and consistent way of estimating the player's ability, which can be subjective and dynamic. It also requires having a ground truth label for each assignment, which can be costly and impractical to obtain. Moreover, this metric does not reflect the user feedback or satisfaction, which is the ultimate goal of the model.

D . Rate of return as measured by additional revenue generated minus the cost of developing a new model is not a good metric, as it is not directly related to the model's performance. It measures the profitability of the model, which is a secondary objective. Moreover, this metric can be affected by many other factors, such as the market conditions, the pricing strategy, the marketing campaigns, and the competition.


Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

How to measure user engagement

How to choose the right metrics for your machine learning model

Page:    1 / 14   
Total 283 questions