You have been tasked to ensure that audit logs on mobility gateways contain accurate timestamps, keeping security in mind. Which configuration change would best secure the time clock against attacks?
Answer : B
A customer wants to prevent 'man-in-the-middle' attacks based on Layer 2 addressing. What will help address that concern?
Answer : B
Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
To prevent man-in-the-middle attacks based on Layer 2 (Ethernet) addressing, enabling ARP inspection in the VLAN context is recommended. ARP inspection validates ARP packets and ensures only legitimate ARP responses are forwarded.
Enabling ARP inspection at VLAN level allows granular control.
Interface-level or global context is less typical or supported for ARP inspection on Aruba CX switches.
ArubaOS-CX Security Features Guide
HPE Aruba ARP Inspection Best Practices
Network Security Documentation for Aruba CX Switches
You are troubleshooting a WLAN deployment with APs and gateways set up with an 802.1X tunneled SSID. End-users are complaining that they can't connect to the enterprise SSID. Which possible AP tunnel states could be the cause of the issue? (Select two.)
Answer : A, C
Refer to the exhibit.


A customer is reporting that connectivity is failing for some wireless client devices. What is your conclusion based on the capture?
Answer : A
In a campus topology using VSX with two aggregation switches and downlinks to access switches, which LAG interface configuration at the aggregation layer is correct based on the parameters below?
ZTP VLAN 1001
access switch MGMT VLAN 2002
access switch MGMT VLAN is tagged
connectivity to the access switch should be maintained before and after the ZTP operation is complete
A.

B.

C.

D.

Answer : A
A customer's infrastructure is set up to use both primary and secondary gateway clusters on the SSID profile based on best practices. Why do they have an equal split of their 260 APs across the primary and secondary gateway clusters?
Answer : D
You have applied the following OSPF configuration but are seeing the output from the command below. What is the reason for this?

Answer : D
The question concerns an OSPF configuration where the interface does not come up as expected.
Common reasons for no OSPF adjacency or interface participation include:
Interfaces being passive (no adjacency formed)
Mismatched OSPF process IDs
Missing loopback interfaces (for router ID)
Layer-3 interfaces not associated with VRFs when VRFs are configured
Option D (a Layer-3 interface has not been associated with a VRF) is the root cause because in Aruba CX switches, when VRF is configured, all Layer-3 interfaces that participate in OSPF must be associated with the correct VRF instance to establish adjacency and participate correctly.
If an interface is not part of the VRF configured for OSPF, it will not appear in the OSPF interface list or form neighbors.
ArubaOS-CX VRF and OSPF configuration guides
OSPF troubleshooting guides on Aruba CX switches
Aruba Network Design Best Practices documents