HP Advanced HPE Storage Integrator Solutions Written HPE7-J02 Exam Practice Test

Answer : A

Detailed Explanatio n:

Rationale for Correct Answe r:

HPE CloudPhysics provides comprehensive environment assessment and competitive sizing for virtualized environments (VMware, Hyper-V, etc.). The CloudPhysics collector (available as a .vhdx for Hyper-V) is deployed into the cluster to gather metrics on CPU, memory, storage IOPS/latency, and utilization trends. These analytics feed into the sizing of HPE storage solutions.

Distractors:

B: InfoSight sizing tools work with HPE systems, not competitive 3rd-party storage like Pure.

C: SAF is a manual assessment requiring email submission and is not the correct modern method for this case.

D: NinjaProtected applies to backup analysis, not production Hyper-V cluster sizing.

Key Concept: CloudPhysics.vhdx collector for Hyper-V sizing with 3rd-party infrastructure.

Answer : D

Detailed Explanatio n:

Rationale for Correct Answe r:

Changing HA from Drive Level to Enclosure Level means the system must reserve additional capacity to tolerate the loss of an entire disk enclosure. This decreases usable capacity, as more parity/spare space is required. Performance remains similar, but capacity overhead increases.

Distractors:

A: Multiple enclosures exist in the config; option is valid.

B: Switched vs direct-connect is unrelated to HA settings.

C: Performance estimates are not directly reduced by HA level change; capacity is.

Key Concept: Enclosure HA = more reserve overhead less usable capacity.

Answer : D

Answer : C

Detailed Explanatio n:

Rationale for Correct Answe r:

Option C is correct because HPE StoreOnce Virtual Lock technology provides immutability at the Catalyst store level, preventing backup data from being deleted or modified for a defined retention period. This ensures ransomware or malicious actors cannot encrypt, alter, or delete the protected backups, aligning with modern data protection requirements for immutability and compliance. In integration with Veeam v12, backups stored on StoreOnce Catalyst stores can be locked, creating an additional immutability layer beyond application-consistent snapshots.

Analysis of Incorrect Options (Distractors):

A: Virtual Lock is not a Veeam feature. While Veeam v12 supports immutability on certain storage backends (object lock-enabled S3, hardened Linux repositories), HPE Virtual Lock is specific to StoreOnce Catalyst stores, not Veeam job settings.

B: VMware vCenter datastores do not have a native immutability feature. Snapshots in vCenter can be deleted or corrupted during ransomware events, making this option incorrect.

D: HPE Alletra arrays support application-consistent snapshots and replication, but they do not provide the immutability guarantee that StoreOnce Virtual Lock enforces. Array-level snapshots can still be deleted if admin credentials are compromised.

Key Concept:

This question targets knowledge of HPE StoreOnce Virtual Lock --- a feature designed to enforce immutability on Catalyst backup stores, making backup data resistant to deletion or alteration during ransomware or insider attacks.

HPE StoreOnce Systems Technical White Paper

HPE StoreOnce and Veeam Integration Best Practices

HPE Data Protection Solutions for Ransomware Resilience Guide

Answer : B

Detailed Explanatio n:

Rationale for Correct Answe r:

The exhibit shows a system delivering ~2.3 GB/s sequential read. For large-block sequential workloads, aggregate host link bandwidth (number speed of front-end ports) is the primary limiter. Increasing the count of 10/25 Gb iSCSI NICs adds parallel lanes, raising sustained read GB/s to the hosts. This is a recommended first step in HPE sizing before changing protocols.

Analysis of Incorrect Options (Distractors):

A: Adding an expansion shelf increases capacity, not front-end bandwidth.

C: Moving to 32 Gb FC can help, but simply adding more existing 10/25 Gb ports achieves the same goal without a protocol/adapter change and is the straightforward, supported scale-out path.

D: SCM (Storage Class Memory) targets latency/IOPS; it doesn't materially lift sequential GB/s if the link budget is the bottleneck.

Key Concept: Scale front-end connectivity to increase sequential throughput; capacity or media class changes won't fix a link-limited system.

Answer : B

Detailed Explanatio n:

Rationale for Correct Answe r:

The choice of assessment tool (e.g., HPE CloudPhysics for VMware vs. CloudPhysics.vhdx collector for Hyper-V) depends primarily on the virtualization platform in use. VMware and Hyper-V require different collectors, and this is the deciding factor for tool selection.

Distractors:

A: Public cloud use matters for hybrid sizing but not for tool selection.

C: Expired contracts are unrelated to tool choice.

D: Procurement model (CapEx vs. GreenLake) is separate from sizing assessment.

Key Concept: Assessment tool choice = based on hypervisor platform (VMware vs Hyper-V).

Answer : A

Detailed Explanatio n:

Rationale for Correct Answe r:

In Brocade (HPE B-Series) SAN switches, FCIP trunking allows multiple IP circuits to be aggregated. This increases bandwidth and provides resiliency (if one link fails, traffic continues over remaining paths). It is the correct statement regarding HPE's FCIP feature set.

Distractors:

B: High availability still requires redundant fabrics; FCIP trunking alone doesn't replace fabric design best practices.

C: FCIP can run over shared IP WANs; no need for dedicated links.

D: Encryption adds overhead; performance impact exists (although minimal with hardware offload).

Key Concept: FCIP trunking = bandwidth + availability for multisite SAN.