A customer has reported an unexplained reboot of an ONTAP node that did not generate a panic string or a core file.
In this scenario, which two sets of logs do you collect to further diagnosis the issue? (Choose two.)
Answer : A, C
Your customer's MetroCluster has generated a "DISK REDUNDANCY FAILED" message.
Netapp-EmA:
Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv' failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmA:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv1 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'1 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:15 CET [netapp-EmA:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv2 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:18 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'2 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmA:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteB_2:13.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111161] was removed
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmA:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteB_2:5.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111160] was removed
Netapp-EmB:
Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv' failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmB:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv2 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmB:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv1 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'1 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:18 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'2 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmB:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteA_2:13.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111167] was removed
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmB:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteA_2:5.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111164] was removed
Referring to the messages shown in the exhibit for each node, which component is causing the problem?
Answer : D
Your Windows clients were able to access your CIFS SVM yesterday. Today they are no longer able to access the CIFS SVM on your NetApp cluster. Your IT security team just pushed out a new group policy to enhance security.
In this scenario, which statement is true?
Answer : A
You have an ONTAP 2-node cluster. You run a read/write test workload against an SMB share, and it is slower than you expected. You run the same test again, but this time you monitor the storage using a QoS command.

Referring to the exhibit, what is the problem?
Answer : B
Which type of MetroCluster is shown in the exhibit?
Answer : C
You have a 4-node MetroCluster system. A node needs to be taken down for maintenance, but all data needs to remain online.
In this scenario, what should you do to bring down a single node?
Answer : A
You receive the error shown below on a FAS2750 HA pair.
Mon Jun 24 00:27:30 UTC [NetappA: scsi_cmdblk_strthr_admin: scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Unknown device 0a.00.99: Check Condition: CDB 0x12: Sense Data SCSI:hardware error - (0x4 - 0x44 0x0 0x0) (0).
The system is cabled as shown in the exhibit.

What should you do to clear the error?
Answer : C