You have a NetApp ONTAP cluster consisting of four NetApp FAS8200 controllers with two NetApp CN1610 cluster switches running ONIAP 9.8 software. You are receiving several alert messages stating that the cluster network has degraded. After troubleshooting, you determine that the errors are being generated from Node 2, interface e0b.
In this scenario, what should you do first to solve this problem?
Answer : A
A Twinax cable is a type of copper cable that is used to connect cluster ports to cluster switches1.
A cluster port is a network port that is configured for cluster communication and data access2.
A cluster network can be degraded due to various reasons, such as misconfiguration, malfunction, or excessive link errors on the cluster ports or the cluster switches.
Link errors are errors that occur on the physical layer of the network, such as CRC errors, length errors, alignment errors, or dropped packets.
Link errors can indicate a problem with the cable, the switch port, the network interface card (NIC), or the cable connector.
In this scenario, the alert messages state that the cluster network has degraded and the errors are being generated from Node 2, interface e0b.
The first step to solve this problem is to replace the Twinax cable between Node 2, interface e0b and the NetApp CN1610 switch, as this could be the source of the link errors.
Replacing the cable could resolve the issue and restore the cluster network to a healthy state.
If replacing the cable does not solve the problem, then other steps may be required, such as checking the switch port, the NIC, or the cable connector, or replacing the switch or the motherboard.Reference:
1: Cluster network cabling, ONTAP 9 Documentation Center
2: Cluster ports, ONTAP 9 Documentation Center
3: Cluster switches, ONTAP 9 Documentation Center
4: Cluster network, ONTAP 9 Documentation Center
[5]: How to troubleshoot CLUSTER NETWORK DEGRADED error messages, NetApp Knowledge Base
[6]: Cluster network degraded due to high CRC errors on cluster ports, NetApp Knowledge Base
You are attempting to connect a NetApp ONTAP cluster to a very complex network that requires LIFs to fail over across subnets.
How would you accomplish this task?
Answer : C
A LIF (Logical Interface) is a logical entity that represents a network connection point on a node1.
A VIP LIF (Virtual IP LIF) is a LIF that can fail over across subnets within an IPspace2.
1: Logical Interfaces, ONTAP 9 Documentation Center
2: VIP LIFs, ONTAP 9 Documentation Center
3: Configuring BGP on a cluster, ONTAP 9 Documentation Center
You are deploying NetApp ONTAP Select. When trying to add VMware vCenter to the inventory, you receive the message shown below.
Credential authentication failed for x.x.x.x with: HostConnectionFailed
In this scenario, how would you correct this problem?
A customer enabled NFSv4.0 on an SVM and changed the client mount from NFSv3 to NFSv4. Afterwards, the customer found that the directory owner was changed from root to nobody.
In this scenario, which statement is true?
Answer : D
Your customer mentions that they have accidentally destroyed both root aggregates in their two-node cluster.
In this scenario, what are two actions that must be performed? (Choose two.)
Answer : A, C
If both root aggregates are destroyed in a two-node cluster, the cluster will be inoperable and the data will be inaccessible. To recover from this situation, you need to perform the following actions:
Install ONTAP from a USB device on one of the nodes. This will create a new root aggregate and a new cluster on that node.
Rejoin the second node to the re-created cluster. This will also create a new root aggregate on the second node and synchronize it with the first node.
Restore the cluster configuration and data from a backup, if available.Reference=
Storage System Recovery Troubleshooting
Recovering from a root aggregate failure
Refer to the exhibit.
Referring to the exhibit, what do you need to do to return the MetroCluster to a normal state?
Answer : B
The other options are not correct, because:
Understanding MetroCluster data protection and disaster recovery - NetApp
Perform IP MetroCluster switchover and switchback - NetApp
Performing a switchback - NetApp
High-availability configuration - NetApp
You have a customer complaining of long build times from their NetApp ONTAP-based datastores. They provided you packet traces from the controller and client. Analysis of these traces shows an average service response time of 1 ms. QoS output confirms the same. The client traces are reporting an average of 15 ms in the same time period.
In this situation, what would be your next step?
Answer : B
The question describes a scenario where the controller and client have a significant difference in their reported latency for the same datastores.
The controller's latency is 1 ms, which is within the normal range for ONTAP-based datastores1.
The other options are not relevant or appropriate for this scenario, because:
A) The cluster is not responding slowly, as the controller's latency is low and QoS output confirms the same.
ONTAP 9 Performance - Resolution Guide - NetApp Knowledge Base
Performance troubleshooting - NetApp
How to troubleshoot performance issues in Data ONTAP 8 7-mode
Cluster interconnect network - NetApp
How to generate a sync core on a node - NetApp