Nokia Segment Routing 4A0-116 Exam Questions

Page: 1 / 14
Total 40 questions
Question 1

In which of the following aspects does the configuration of flex-algo LSPs have an advantage over the configuration of SR-TE LSPs?



Answer : D

Flex-Algo LSPs are a type of LSP that allows for greater flexibility in configuring traffic engineering constraints. This is because flex-algo LSPs can be configured with a unique set of traffic engineering constraints for each LSP, whereas SR-TE LSPs use a predefined set of traffic engineering constraints that applies to all LSPs.

Label stack size of the encapsulated data packets, List of traffic-engineering constraint types available to choose from, and Ability to associate one primary and up to two secondary paths to the same LSP are not the advantages of flex-algo LSPs over SR-TE LSPs.


Question 2

Which of the following statements about primary and secondary SR-TE LSP paths is FALSE?



Answer : B

Typically, in SR-TE, only two paths can be configured for a given SR-TE LSP: primary path and secondary path. The primary path is used for normal traffic forwarding, and the secondary path is used as a backup in case the primary path fails. Only one LSP path forwards the traffic at any time.


Question 3

Which of the following is NOT a valid option to steer traffic into a flex-algo segment-routing tunnel?



Answer : D

Applying a VSI import policy to an EVPN service and enabling the sr-is-is or sr-ospf tunnel type for the service is not a valid option for steering traffic into a flex-algo segment-routing tunnel, VSI is not related to flex-algo SR.


Question 4

Which of the following is an advantage of enabling label stack reduction for a CSPF-calculated path, as compared to using plain CSPF?



Answer : A

Once a path is associated with an LSP, it cannot be used by other LSPs is False. A path can be used by multiple LSPs, but each LSP can have different attributes like bandwidth, priority and other constraints.


Question 5

Based on the exhibit, which of the following statements about fast re-route for flex-algo instance 129 is TRUE?



Answer : C


Question 6

An SR-TE LSP with a path definition that includes router R4 as a loose hop and for which Seamless-BFD has been enabled is following the path shown in the exhibit. What happens after router R4 fails if the routers along the path follow the default behavior?



Answer : C

When an SR-TE LSP with Seamless-BFD enabled, the BFD sessions are established between the routers along the path to detect any failures quickly. If a failure happens in the path, the router will stop forwarding the traffic and send a BFD control packet to the head-end router. In this case, R4 failed, BFD sessions will detect the failure and send a message to the head-end router, but since R4 is a loose hop, the path doesn't have to be re-calculate. The head-end router will continue forwarding traffic to the current next-hop, R2, which will be discarded at the point of failure (R4) as it doesn't know about the failure. And the traffic will not be redirected to R3 after IGP reconvergence.


Question 7

For any of the LFA methods to work properly, there must be a router in the backup path that will forward traffic addressed to the destination without sending it back to the source. Which of the following statements describes the way R-LFA selects such a router?



Answer : D

R-LFA (Remote Loop-Free Alternate) is a method that can select either an immediate neighbor or a remote router to be used as a backup next hop, as long as the backup path coincides with the path that will become active after IGP reconvergence.


Page:    1 / 14   
Total 40 questions