Which two factors drive the potential level of assurance that an assurance provider may target?
Answer : A
The two factors that drive the potential level of assurance an assurance provider may target are competence and objectivity. Competence refers to the assurance provider's knowledge, skills, and experience necessary to perform the assessment effectively. Objectivity refers to the assurance provider's impartiality and independence from the area being assessed, ensuring that the assessment is unbiased and credible. Both factors are essential for providing a reliable and accurate assurance. Reference:
IIA Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing
ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
Follow-up on the implementation status of the recommendation based on high priority, due or overdue items or time-sensitive items is known as:
Answer : C
Follow-up on the implementation status of recommendations based on high priority, due or overdue items, or time-sensitive items is known as Follow-Up by Targeted Review. This approach focuses on areas that are of critical importance or where timely implementation is essential. It helps ensure that the most significant risks are addressed promptly and that any delays in addressing recommendations are identified and managed. Reference:
IIA Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing
COSO Internal Control -- Integrated Framework
When planning an Assessment, it is important to
Answer : A
Including the personnel who perform the work being assessed in the planning process is important because they possess valuable insights and knowledge about the processes and controls in place. Their involvement helps to ensure that the assessment is accurately scoped and relevant parameters are set. They can provide context and clarify operational details, contributing to a more effective and targeted assessment. Moreover, their engagement can foster a cooperative environment and facilitate smoother assessment execution. Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
COSO Internal Control -- Integrated Framework
To evaluate operating effectiveness
Answer : A
To evaluate the operating effectiveness of controls, conducting control testing is essential. Control testing involves examining whether controls are operating as intended and are effective in mitigating risks. This type of testing assesses the design and implementation of controls to ensure they are functioning properly and achieving their intended purpose. Substantive testing, on the other hand, focuses on verifying the accuracy and validity of transactions and data, rather than the effectiveness of controls. Reference:
COSO Internal Control -- Integrated Framework
ISO 31000:2018 - Risk management -- Guidelines
Assessments should be selected based on
Answer : B
Assessments should be selected based on how objectives connect and prioritize the risk universe and assessment universe. This approach ensures that the assessments are aligned with the organization's strategic goals and that the most significant risks are addressed. It involves understanding the organization's risk landscape and prioritizing assessments that focus on the areas of highest impact and relevance to achieving objectives. Reference:
ISO 31000:2018 - Risk management -- Guidelines
COSO Enterprise Risk Management -- Integrating with Strategy and Performance
Which of these is defined as "internally directing, controlling and evaluating an entity, process or resource"
Answer : A
Management is defined as 'internally directing, controlling and evaluating an entity, process or resource.' Management involves overseeing the day-to-day operations of an organization, making decisions, setting policies, and ensuring that the organization's resources are used effectively to achieve its goals. This function includes planning, organizing, leading, and controlling organizational activities to meet established objectives. Reference:
ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems -- Requirements
COSO Internal Control -- Integrated Framework
What are the common attributes of an assurance professional?
Answer : A
The common attributes of an assurance professional are independence, objectivity, and diligence. Independence ensures that the assurance professional is free from any influence or conflict of interest that could affect their judgment. Objectivity refers to the ability to provide an unbiased and impartial assessment. Diligence involves a thorough and careful approach to the assurance process, ensuring that all relevant aspects are evaluated and reported accurately. These attributes are essential for maintaining the credibility and reliability of assurance activities. Reference:
IIA Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing
ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems