Which SAFe principle ensures the maximum benefit is generated by understanding trade-offs between risks, cost of delay, operational costs, and development costs for each program and Value Stream?
Answer : A
Taking an economic view is the SAFe principle that ensures the maximum benefit is generated by understanding trade-offs between risks, cost of delay, operational costs, and development costs for each program and value stream1. This principle requires a fundamental understanding of the economics of building systems and making decisions in a proper economic context.This includes the strategy for incremental value delivery and the broader economic framework for each value stream2.Taking an economic view helps to optimize the flow of value, reduce waste, and deliver solutions that meet customer and stakeholder needs3.
1:SAFe Lean-Agile Principles - Scaled Agile Framework2:Principle #1 -- Take an economic view - Scaled Agile Framework3:Adopting Lean Budgeting Aligned to Development Value Streams
Question 2
When should government technology programs be organized as Solution Trains?
Answer : D
According to theSolution Trainarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, Solution Trains are the organizational construct used to build large solutions that require the coordination of multiple ARTs and suppliers. The article states that ''Solution Trains form for different reasons. Some trains form with new ARTs and Agile Teams to specifically address a large initiative, while others begin by combining existing ARTs and teams.'' Therefore, the correct answer is D, when the size and complexity require two or more ARTs. The other options are not relevant to the definition of a Solution Train.
Question 3
Which option is a Safe Core Value?
Answer : C
According to theCore Valuesarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, relentless improvement is one of the four core values of SAFe, along with alignment, transparency, and respect for people. The article states that ''Relentless improvement is a constant sense of danger combined with a paranoid desire to find a better way. It's a culture of organizational self-assessment, problem-solving, and action. It's a willingness to change before the crisis forces us to do so. It's a commitment to relentless reflection and a continuous learning journey.'' Therefore, the correct answer is C, relentless improvement. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the core values of SAFe. Intrinsic motivation of knowledge workers is a principle, not a value, of SAFe. Individuals and interactions is a value of the Agile Manifesto, not of SAFe. Built-in quality is an aspect of SAFe, not a value.
Question 4
What describes converting unpredictable events into predictable ones?
Answer : C
According to theApply Cadence, Synchronize with Cross-Domain Planningarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, cadence is the term that describes converting unpredictable events into predictable ones. The article states that ''Cadence is the rhythm, or heartbeat, of the Agile Release Train (ART). It provides a steady and predictable pattern for planning, developing, and delivering value. Cadence helps teams manage the variability inherent in product development. By converting unpredictable events into predictable ones, cadence enables fast and reliable decision-making.'' Therefore, the correct answer is C, cadence. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the terms that describe converting unpredictable events into predictable ones. Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration (A) is a special iteration that occurs at the end of every Program Increment (PI) and provides an opportunity for innovation, planning, and system-level integration and testing. Program Increment (PI) Planning (B) is a face-to-face event that serves as the heartbeat of the ART, aligning all the teams on the ART to a shared mission and vision. Backlog refinement (D) is the process of breaking down, estimating, and prioritizing the backlog items.
Question 5
What are two reasons the Agile Manifesto for Software Development is still relevant to Lean-Agile Enterprises? (Choose two.)
Answer : A, E
Two reasons the Agile Manifesto for Software Development is still relevant to Lean-Agile Enterprises are:
It provides the foundation for empowered, self-organizing Agile teams.The Agile Manifesto values individuals and interactions over processes and tools, working software over comprehensive documentation, customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and responding to change over following a plan1.These values support the creation of cross-functional, autonomous, and collaborative teams that can deliver value to customers and stakeholders in an agile way2.
SAFe extends the value system and principles of the Agile Manifesto to teams of Agile teams.SAFe is based on the Agile Manifesto, but also incorporates additional values and principles that address the challenges of scaling agile to the enterprise level3.SAFe values alignment, built-in quality, transparency, and program execution, as well as the four original values of the Agile Manifesto4.SAFe also applies nine additional principles that guide the behavior of teams of Agile teams, or Agile Release Trains (ARTs), in a Lean-Agile context5.
1:Agile Manifesto for Software Development | Agile Alliance2:The Agile Manifesto at 20: What's still relevant---and what's not | TechBeacon3:SAFe Lean-Agile Principles - Scaled Agile Framework4:Core Values - Scaled Agile Framework5:SAFe Lean-Agile Principles - Scaled Agile Framework
Question 6
In addition to Program Increment (PI) Objectives and uncommitted objectives, what also must be identified during PI Planning?
Answer : B
In addition to PI objectives and uncommitted objectives, program risks must also be identified during PI planning1.Program risks are the uncertainties or impediments that may affect the ART's ability to deliver value in the PI2. Identifying and managing program risks is a collaborative activity that involves all the teams and stakeholders in the ART.The program risks are captured in the program risks board, which is a visual tool that helps prioritize and track the resolution of the risks3.
Which statement is true about optimizing batch sizes for newly-formed SAFe teams in a program?
Answer : A
According to theVisualize and Limit WIP, Reduce Batch Sizes, and Manage Queue Lengthsarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost. The article states that ''To improve the economics of handling smaller batches---and thus increase throughput---teams must focus on reducing the transaction costs of any batch. This is a continuous improvement activity that happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost.'' Therefore, the correct answer is A, batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the statements that are true about optimizing batch sizes for newly-formed SAFe teams in a program. Batch size is not optimized immediately by looking at transaction and holding costs (B), as it takes time for teams to understand the nature of the work, identify bottlenecks, and find the optimal batch size that minimizes both costs. Batch size is not already optimized if there is continuous flow , as optimization involves finding the right balance between batch size and costs, even within a continuous flow environment. Batch size is not optimized when transaction and holding costs seldom change (D), as holding costs and transaction costs can change over time due to various factors such as team size, workload, and external dependencies.
All Official Question Types