Scaled Agile SAFe 5 Government Practitioner Exam (5.0) SAFe-SGP Exam Practice Test

Answer : B

Authenticity is the aspect of leading by example that challenges Lean-Agile leaders to 'walk the talk' by being a role model of desired professional and ethical behaviors by acting with honesty, integrity, and transparency1. Authentic leaders are genuine, self-aware, and trustworthy.They align their actions with their words and values, and they inspire trust and respect from others2.Authenticity helps leaders create a culture of openness, collaboration, and continuous learning in their organizations3.

1:Lean-Agile Leadership - Scaled Agile Framework2:What Is One Way Lean-agile Leaders Lead by Example? - CGAA3:Three Dimensions of Lean-Agile Leadership: A Guide for Leading Your ...

Answer : A, E

According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting and calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries are two recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. The article states that ''To track expenditures, the Program Backlog can be tagged with funding metadata for future reporting. Additionally, a fixed cost labor cost per ART can be calculated based on actual salaries. This simplifies the tracking of labor costs and allows for more accurate forecasting.'' Therefore, the correct answers are A, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting, and E, calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. Organizing ARTs by funding classification (B) is not a recommended practice, as it may create silos and reduce collaboration across ARTs. Including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement is not a necessary step, as the backlog items should be prioritized based on value and not on cost. Using charge codes assigned by each program (D) is not a simple or effective way to track expenditures, as it may introduce overhead and complexity.

Answer : C, D

According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, feature progress charts and burn-up charts are two visual reporting tools that can be used to help maintain fiduciary tracking of government technology programs. The article states that ''SAFe provides a wide array of metrics and management tools to monitor program performance. Other metrics---such as feature progress charts, ART Kanban boards, burn-up charts, and continuous flow diagrams (Figure 3)---make program performance highly visible and transparent, enabling better fiduciary control.'' Therefore, the correct answers are C, feature progress charts, and D, burn-up charts. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the visual reporting tools that can be used to help maintain fiduciary tracking of government technology programs. Detailed spreadsheets (A) are not visual tools, but rather data sources that can be used to create visual reports. Pro formas (B) are financial statements that project future outcomes, not track current performance. Integrated master schedules (E) are traditional project management tools that show the dependencies and milestones of various tasks, not the value delivery and progress of features.

Answer : A

The appropriate Lean action to take once all of the expected value of an Epic has been delivered, even if all of the planned Features have not been completed, is to close the Epic1. This means that the Epic Owner declares that the epic is done and no further work is required. Closing the epic frees up the resources and budget that were allocated to it, and allows the teams to focus on other value streams and initiatives.Closing the epic also enables the Epic Owner to measure the actual outcomes and benefits of the epic, and compare them with the expected ones in the Lean business case2. Closing the epic does not mean that the solution is fixed and cannot be changed or improved later.It simply means that the current hypothesis of the epic has been validated or invalidated, and that further work can be initiated as new epics or features if needed3.

1:Epic - Scaled Agile Framework2:Epic - Scaled Agile Framework3:Epic - Scaled Agile Framework

Answer : C

An attribute of a high-performing team is healthy conflict. Healthy conflict means that the team members are able to express their diverse opinions, perspectives, and ideas in a constructive and respectful way. They also listen to each other, seek to understand different viewpoints, and resolve disagreements through consensus or compromise.Healthy conflict fosters creativity, innovation, and learning within the team, and helps the team to deliver better solutions that meet the customer and stakeholder needs12.

1:Creating High Performing Teams of Teams - Scaled Agile Framework2:4 Qualities of High Performing Teams You Must Know! | Turing

Answer : A

According to theDecentralize Decision-Makingarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, the type of decision that should be decentralized is the one that has a high cost of delay. The article states that ''All other decisions should be decentralized. Characteristics of these types of decisions include: Frequent -- The problems addressed by decentralized decisions are recurrent and common (e.g., Team and Program Backlog prioritization, real-time Agile Release Train [ART] scoping, response to defects and emerging issues). Time-critical -- The cost of delay for these decisions is high, and waiting for approval or consensus would cause significant waste or missed opportunities. Reversible -- The consequences of these decisions are not long-lasting or irreversible and can be easily changed or corrected if needed.'' Therefore, the correct answer is A, high cost of delay. The other options are not accurate, as they are either irrelevant or better suited for centralized decisions.

Answer : B

According to theEssential SAFearticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, the Product Owner (PO) is the role in SAFe that has content authority over the Agile Team's backlog. The article states that ''The Product Owner (PO) is the content authority for the team backlog. The PO is responsible for defining stories and prioritizing the backlog.'' Therefore, the correct answer is B, Product Owner. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the roles that have content authority over the Agile Team's backlog. The Release Train Engineer (A) is the servant leader and chief Scrum Master for the Agile Release Train (ART). The Product Management is the content authority for the program backlog. The Agile Team (D) is the cross-functional group of developers, testers, and other specialists that deliver value in an iteration.